Message from @L0GAN
Discord ID: 506581929756327937
I'm not a Greek
@Deleted User ameen
Anglo-Saxon paganism is the only truth
For example, most developed countries aren’t ethno states so going off ethnicity is dumb
<:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465>
nah but like, what I was saying
Lol Pisslam won't conquer shit
900 iq logic
you've been declining since the Mongols raped Baghdad
Developed countries aren't ethnostates because people from 3rd world countries flood there
There's communists, fascists, liberals, conservatives,and just about every political position you can think of in France
and other similar nation states
I love how we get pinged for dumb shit
there's not really any core ideal
hell, culture varies quite a bit too
But nobody cares Merkel is not running for parliament in 2021
based on the city, various regional trends, and so on
even then, why about...
Strasbourg for instance?
I want to see japan invaded by muslims and Africans so the japan ethnostate meme can die
yes
We get pinged for dumb announcements
But not for Merkel
Hitler was a Jewish plant
lel
Hitler was a Syrian refugee
Hitler was a Syrian jew
let's keep it at this point,shall we?
seems that everyone agrees that a key factor is ethnicity,and this is a fair definition of it
No. I don't agree. The foundation of a nation state is its history. It cannot be its ethnicity otherwise there would be no imperialistoc nation state by definition.
There have been succesful cases of assimilation of places from many different backgrounds
ask the US for instance
It's been mostly for the settlement of Americans from other regions that populated what otherwise would've been wastelands
try to go the any of the states formed from the Lousiana purchase and spot ties to its french history outside of the names of the cities and flags
(and of course don't come here with New Orleans,that's more the exception than the rule)
If a state is a nation state that encompases multiple nations, that means it favour one nation.
There are very specific single culture dominant regions in a country, for example, Quebec in Canada, Utah in United States. Then there are communities of Asians, Arabs, Hispanics etc. spreading across several counties.
lol assimilation, you mean reducing your culture to consumerism? The US still to this day has massive pockets of unassimilated yet coexisting whites. Literally some cities are purely of a specific descent, german, finnish, swedish, polish etc. On the streets you speak english sure, but much of the local culture, and food, is literally ethnic. Brazil is another perfect example of, if you let cultures exist and dont replace them with comsumerism ou get brazil. Usually though you have a dominant culture that opresses (which it must necessarily) the minority cultures. Hell during my time in the US on the west coast ther eis no culture, its literally multikulti. I could appreciate asian, scandinavian, hispanic culture. But press me on what american culture is an I couldnt even really tell you from my experience living on the west coast (some 12 years there).
The principle foundation for the nation state, more often than not, is its people and their common cultural group. Generally the nation is well, an ethnicity a homogenous people with little variety between each other, the state exists to accumulate and focus the power nad will of this ethnicity. It is more a formalization and organization of this group. The nation state as such is founded upon its people and its specific cultural group, ergo ethnicity. Ethnicity means a cultural group which means a specific homogenous genetic group that then has a common culture and group identity.
the definition proposed by goodle is of course brutally filtered.