Message from @|4d|61|74|74|
Discord ID: 520287271711277056
He was just talking about religious stuff today on a podcast on youtube, hes a russian orthodox.
Creationism, Evolution is a flawed theory and has a very circumstantial basis. Only God could have made the animals you see around you today.
@CrowGoCaw you are not right wing
leave
^this
Devolution
Intelligent Design ftw
Both. Creation is about the creation of the spiritual world. evolution is a physical process that is proven. How the spirit of things relate to the physical world or how it has affected evolution is a matter of debate.
There is a lot of evidence for evolution or an evolution like process but this doesn’t take anything from the creation. Evolution is just a physical process in the real world things happen because there is a will or force that makes it possible .
Evolution. It seems that most people who oppose the idea do so because their own personal incredulity. The way evolution functions makes sense and we know it occurs. There is basically no difference between so-called "micro" and "macro evolution" other than time.
Yes, and obviously if a company has a 100% of growth in 1 year, it will have 100% growth every year.
What about all the fossils
They seem to match with an evolutionary theory
There are issues in evolutionary theory hence why its being revised
generally the issue we come about is how did evolution stat
and generlaly life may have been unavoidable and the forms we see today will simply replicate anywhere life is viable
so the idea is both
however there is a massive question of how DNA even came to be, and self replication as thhere is an issue that if i give infinite time and infinite possibilities for combinations I will see information coding for self replication arise... which is not the case.
If we have chaos that functions by certain rules and infinite attempts to creat order, the issue is to create self replicating order, and since the order is no longer subject to the chaos, at least so internally it mus timmediately be formed as self replicating order.
The way proteins fold, the way they interact and are held otgether all seems almost scripted, legitimately it seems designed when you actually look at it, its quite an insane machine this biology we have discovered.
(Personally I have an idea of consciousness playing part in this, to the point were cells have their own consciousness and generally this would change all of biology but all I have is some videos here and there... While I wish I had a lab, im a student and no one will take me seriously)
Scientific theories are revised as better evidence is discovered, that's what makes it science and not dogma. That is not to say that there is no such thing as "scientific dogma", what happens when the evidence is not put first. When that happens, it's not science at all. I do think nature is amazing and complex. I don't see that as a reason to believe in something more complex, unprecedented and untestable like the supernatural. We can observe some things that support the theory of evolution, quite a few things actually. The same can not be said of creation theory or ID. There are also things that don't make sense if one was creating beings, flaws or vestigial structures. I'm not really knowledgeable on the subject but I think this video speaks to some of the issues brought up about abiogenesis, which is really a separate issue from evolution. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1xnYFCZ9Yg
You are completely wrong. We now know that Neo Darwinism is wrong because horizontal gene transfer has been proven. The argument from Neo Darwinists was that their model which does not include horizontal gene transfer or epigenetics was sufficient to explain diversity of life. We now know that statement was a lie because there was no evidence of that. All studies conducted on mutation rate showed otherwise.
Creationism or ID may not be Science, but Evolutionists are liars. And I would rather have pseudo Science than lying progressivism
first
```Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) or lateral gene transfer (LGT)[1][2][3] is the movement of genetic material between unicellular and/or multicellular organisms other than by the ("vertical") transmission of DNA from parent to offspring (reproduction).[4] HGT is an important factor in the evolution of many organisms.[5][6] ```
```The argument from Neo Darwinists was that their model which does not include horizontal gene transfer or epigenetics ````
this
what
uwotm8?
```The argument from Neo Darwinists was that their model which does not include horizontal gene transfer or epigenetics was sufficient to explain diversity of life.```
>does not include horizontal gene transfer
```Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) or lateral gene transfer (LGT)[1][2][3] is the movement of genetic material between unicellular and/or multicellular organisms other than by the ("vertical") transmission of DNA from parent to offspring (reproduction).[4] HGT is an important factor in the evolution of many organisms.[5][6] ```
>by reproduction
>natural selection
are you fucking retarded
``` It often involves temperate bacteriophages and plasmids```
(horizontal gene transfer theory)
>inheritable genetic material
>major factors responsible .... include mutations, genetic recombination, natural selection
mutations fucking include alien plasmids
who the fuck is lying, I never even fucking read about darwinism (at least neo-darwinism) but the first two sources claim against you
Do you have trouble reading? Or you have low IQ? You literally posted a definition for HGT that says other than from parents to offsprings and then you posted what Neo Darwinism that says inheritable
Read this paper, dumbass
``` inheritable (Än-hÄ•rˈÄ-tÉ™-bÉ™l)â–º
adj.
That can be inherited: inheritable traits; inheritable property.
adj.
Having the right to inherit or the capability of inheriting: an inheritable heir.
```