Yes the country should come before the individual, but the government shouldn’t needlessly revoke some liberties to benefit individuals.

I mean during certain situations, like a Homeland invasion, it'd make sense to revoke nearly all rights including trial, speech, press, in order to facilitate a victory

Of course at that point no one would give a hoot if your neighbour gets to keep there gun if they are sympathizing with an invading force.

Personally I think drug dealers need to be suspended their right to trial

And suppliers

That is a good idea, but would this extend to non-lethal drugs?

We give up our right to smuggle explosives in our luggage, while also giving up our rights to our full body scans. As to what the hell the TSA uses our full body scans for, one can only imagine. It may or may not be used for research purposes.

>right to smuggle explosives

As for full body scans fuck them

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

-At what age should a child, rather than the parent, be held responsible for it’s crimes and to what extent?

1st

16

12*

What do you mean?

4

LOL NO AGE. WELCOME TO ANCAPISTAN

12

4

The only thing Hitler did wrong was not to do the holocaust

I would say no later than 12

When ARE the parents Ever held responsible?

Fucking reeee

@Victor Von Doom Don't take this the wrong way, but it's, should be its*.

around 13

what if i train a 6yr old to shootup a school. would i be held responsible

<:WhatDid:459545655527079946> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:ToMyDrink:459545654323314710>

4

It's fucking 4 fools.

asking for research

<:GWfroggyPepoSmug:398570232647647242>

1

1 Second old.

<:GWfroggyUWot1:398568481823522816><:GWfroggyUWot2:398569119668109312><:GWfroggyUWot3:398569137980309526>

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i need a context.

16.

<:Sheeeeeeeit:476034406423855105>

And only to the extent of how servere the crime is.

Interesting question. If the crime necessitates someone being taken into custody, obviously it would be the person who committed the crime. If it's a crime that causes financial harm then obviously the parent would pay, unless their child is working.

13

Generally though, I dislike punishing people by putting them in cages and would rather them pay for most crimes via fines to the victims.