Message from @taking a break
Discord ID: 522136801545289744
daily question is reliant on
a) who is currently in control of the state
b) who's liberties are being revoked
Yes the country should come before the individual, but the government shouldn’t needlessly revoke some liberties to benefit individuals.
I mean during certain situations, like a Homeland invasion, it'd make sense to revoke nearly all rights including trial, speech, press, in order to facilitate a victory
Of course at that point no one would give a hoot if your neighbour gets to keep there gun if they are sympathizing with an invading force.
Personally I think drug dealers need to be suspended their right to trial
And suppliers
That is a good idea, but would this extend to non-lethal drugs?
We give up our right to smuggle explosives in our luggage, while also giving up our rights to our full body scans. As to what the hell the TSA uses our full body scans for, one can only imagine. It may or may not be used for research purposes.
>right to smuggle explosives
As for full body scans fuck them
@everyone Daily Question 🔖
-At what age should a child, rather than the parent, be held responsible for it’s crimes and to what extent?
1st
16
12*
What do you mean?
4
LOL NO AGE. WELCOME TO ANCAPISTAN
12
4
The only thing Hitler did wrong was not to do the holocaust
When ARE the parents Ever held responsible?
Fucking reeee
@Victor Von Doom Don't take this the wrong way, but it's, should be its*.
around 13
what if i train a 6yr old to shootup a school. would i be held responsible
<:WhatDid:459545655527079946> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:ToMyDrink:459545654323314710>
4
It's fucking 4 fools.
asking for research
<:GWfroggyPepoSmug:398570232647647242>
1
1 Second old.
<:GWfroggyUWot1:398568481823522816><:GWfroggyUWot2:398569119668109312><:GWfroggyUWot3:398569137980309526>
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i need a context.
16.
<:Sheeeeeeeit:476034406423855105>
And only to the extent of how servere the crime is.
Interesting question. If the crime necessitates someone being taken into custody, obviously it would be the person who committed the crime. If it's a crime that causes financial harm then obviously the parent would pay, unless their child is working.
13