K

Non-citizens -> slaves
citizens - proud citizens
citizenship - obtained by the birth right AND merits, or by tests AND merits.

It's self-explanable. You dont need retards to be the citizens of your empire, you need strong people who bring wealth and build your country. Weak should serve

Heritage. And after several generations birthright so that highly skilled or needed people’s can be integrated over several generations.

^

This tbh.

Mostly heritage, but I'm fine with a small minority of immigrants who assimulate into the culture and religion

if your race is weak then there is not a greater thing than to let the others uphold your genetically weak population

look up abbos

So essentially there should be a path to citizenship for legal immigrants, although that path should be long and have a lot of requirements. I actually think Japan has one of the best systems of citizenship systems in the world, due to it being hard to get and not allowing dual citizenship.

the path should be the same for everyone

Race is the foundation of identity and allowing "little Mexico" and the various other ethnic ghettoes is a natural fault line within a nation. This is clear in places like the US where being "American" has lost all meaning and it's now just a place of business where the various racial factions seek to advance their own tribal agenda. People are hyphenated Americans for a reason, they put the important part first. If immigration were to be allowed, it must be controlled and generally of the same stock or as close as possible.

@|4d|61|74|74| Pretty much, though certain heritages should be preferred due to more desirable traits.

if the traits are more intellectually or practically desirable, yeah

I wouldnt force anyone to live in such a country 😉

pass the test, enjoy, or get fuck out.
Can get out, serve lmao

I bet my ass that many people would be more than happy to publicly serve in a government that would not grant them citizenship but shelter and a chance to perhaps one day become a citizen

When I went to middle school there was a kid who was adopted from China and raised by Finnish parents. Honestly I don't think his race mattered much and he was almost as Finnish as eveyone else. I think culture is more important than race.

But would this test be more lenient to certain people’s? Say a Dane would have a better value than a Mongol?

Mongols are smart though

Depends.

i think that the humanity desires intellect, tech, longevity.
No point in not selecting traits that support these :x

If you are born from two Italian parents in foreign soil, but you manage to assimilate to that culture and to the people. You have the right to become a citizen.

Culture is tied to race, your adopted Chinese kid is an exception. That's not a practical solution and adopting a black kid would provide different results.

I agree

I wouldnt disrespect a black person if they were smart and skilled

the issue is that ekhm most dont seem to

depends on the location in the world

sorry for the typo lol

You don’t disrespect them

Blacks in Africa want the land back...
why not muricans lmao
Exchange the citizens, let the africa thrive /s

I know same assimilated blacks too, although they are quite rare

I respect anyone worthy of respect. I respect my people enough to want to preserve them and their culture. I recognize that mixing peoples results in a mix up that is less than it's component parts.

mixing is a natural process

the thing is that you dont want to fuck up the traits...

No, tribalism is natural, with some minor mixing or mixing as a result of domination.

But same rules for everybody, regardless if culture is tied to race or not, one has to assimulate. If assimilation is impossible due to race or some other reason, the person can be deported.

Fucking reee

What is not natural is to let people into your nation based on how much money they can make the top 1% of capitalists schemers.

True

Loyalty to one's nation, acts for one's nation and birthright.

Immigration should be quite limited at least from outside of Europe