The UK is good but not for human rights. More like science and beating the Mughals

Napoleonic - brits win

Swedes creates the world

LMAO

Who do you think controls Britain?

britain

Germanics and meds made our world if we're being realistic

Let me rephrase,

The Brits would have been destroyed in WWII if it weren't for the Soviets.

meds gave the Germanics their ability to do so

nah man @Earl of Morrrrgantown britain is a leader in human rights and has always been recognised as such

Anglos are jews
*change my mind*

(((who))) do you think controls Britain?

Brits were useless in WWII.

and the Germanics made our modern world

"brits were useless" lmao

>french fuck up anglostan
>Rothchilds take control of anglostan

the brits were fighting both germany and the italians on two fronts dude

:o

Swedes CREATED US

Germanics are barbarians

The British army was the weakest and the one who accomplished the less in WWII.

Again, before Barbarossa, Britain was losing.

lmaooo

THEY MADE THE WIRLD GEEAT

Sesland

it was essentially britain that prevented germany from conquering europe

and africa

All of "muh modern advancemunts" were upgrades of med inventions

Jesus.

britainnia

>implying Hitler winning would've been bad

British army should die so hitle could win!!

@Deleted User this

So, are you ready to bow down to your Mediterranean overlords?

Do you think that Britain would have defeated Germany alone if it weren't for the Soviet and American interference?

without the soviets nope

Yeah, because Britain's army was the weakest in the whole conflict.

but the UK still did fantastic to hold out until that point, and then join the offensive when they did

If the Axis worked together, they would've won

Meds are gay