Message from @Spookaswa
Discord ID: 528294536993046579
no system can withstand the widespread application of violence
Be violent, but don't be senseless. Plan your attacks carefully and ensure is a just use of force. If you have to strike, strike hard and efficiently, not blindly and indiscriminately.
That's why antifa fucked up, they just attack anyone at rallies, sometime they even attack their allies.
Antifa is a rabid dog in their attacks
I guess that is a distinction I should have made considering the question was about being like antifa
the only similarity I would have with them is the unabashed use of violence for political ends
No
Don’t resort to their pathetic “partisan” assault tactics
They are fine with the media when they attack
But when we attack, we will get the worst of it
Only defend yourselves from antifa, don't assault them and give them martyr status, that's what they want you to do
in fact, stage events where "antifa" members assault your people, that's what the civil rights movement did to great success
There is an SS documentary on. I love it.
If you fight Antifa in the streets, you go to jail, and they get a hand slap.
Compare what happened to the bike lock guy with the Proud Boy situation.
The Bike lock guy got probation even though he attacked multiple peaceful bystanders with a deadly weapon. The Proud Boys on the other hand are probably go to prison over a minor street brawl. The Antifa guys aren’t facing any charges as far as I know, even though they are habitually stalking and attacking the PB.
Even if you choose to use violence, which I don’t advocate for, you’d have to keep in mind the authorities are going to treat you differently.
Honestly you guys need to read more ghandi and his application of violence
its realy interesting but its very smart
Antifa can do what they do in terms of violence because they have some sort of ethic shield
the ol' "yeah they are violent but they are just beating nazis and those are the bad guys so who cares"
I'm curious, if we had the numbers to organize widespread political violence that police could not respond effectively to, would you even approve of that? Or are you just cowards to the bone.
If we had sufficient numbers, yeah
Trying to go through the "democratic" system is, in general, a waste of time, especially in the Anglosphere, due to the de jure and de facto 2 party systems in these countries
I’ll beat the fuck outta any nazi
Idgaf if it’s “ethical” or not
It’s just the right thing to do
They deserve whatever comes 2 them
native american national socialism doesnt appeal to you turd?
@IV LI V S Numbers don't matter, once you have just enough to maintain a police state while in transition you can do it. The main problem is that people divide for petty issues or minor ideological differences rather than uniting over similar ones. Also no one has the balls to start a coup or militia run takeover anymore, you could effectively with a small number of devoted and selfless men take over a country overnight. Almost everyone is too much of a pussy to do this though so alas it may never happen.
What exactly is national socialiaSm
that'd take too long to explain
What’s a good source to read on it
read a squires trial
Ifhtv
Ight*
Bet
Mein Kampf would be good
Squires Trial is meh
Not bad for a beginners book
But for an introduction to the groundworks that is only a 50ish page read is Squires Trial
I remember the leader of the American Indian movement russell means mentioning reservations are proof of socialism failing
So is it kinda like the rezs basically
I think Stanley G. payne stuff isn't too bad. it's a more academic approach to trying to know what fascism and nacional socialism is. It's always hard because the doctrine is post-hoc