No

Don’t resort to their pathetic “partisan” assault tactics

They are fine with the media when they attack

But when we attack, we will get the worst of it

Only defend yourselves from antifa, don't assault them and give them martyr status, that's what they want you to do

in fact, stage events where "antifa" members assault your people, that's what the civil rights movement did to great success

There is an SS documentary on. I love it.

If you fight Antifa in the streets, you go to jail, and they get a hand slap.

Compare what happened to the bike lock guy with the Proud Boy situation.

The Bike lock guy got probation even though he attacked multiple peaceful bystanders with a deadly weapon. The Proud Boys on the other hand are probably go to prison over a minor street brawl. The Antifa guys aren’t facing any charges as far as I know, even though they are habitually stalking and attacking the PB.

Even if you choose to use violence, which I don’t advocate for, you’d have to keep in mind the authorities are going to treat you differently.

Honestly you guys need to read more ghandi and his application of violence

its realy interesting but its very smart

Antifa can do what they do in terms of violence because they have some sort of ethic shield

the ol' "yeah they are violent but they are just beating nazis and those are the bad guys so who cares"

I'm curious, if we had the numbers to organize widespread political violence that police could not respond effectively to, would you even approve of that? Or are you just cowards to the bone.

If we had sufficient numbers, yeah

Trying to go through the "democratic" system is, in general, a waste of time, especially in the Anglosphere, due to the de jure and de facto 2 party systems in these countries

I’ll beat the fuck outta any nazi

Idgaf if it’s “ethical” or not

It’s just the right thing to do

They deserve whatever comes 2 them

native american national socialism doesnt appeal to you turd?

@ＩＶ ＬＩ Ｖ Ｓ Numbers don't matter, once you have just enough to maintain a police state while in transition you can do it. The main problem is that people divide for petty issues or minor ideological differences rather than uniting over similar ones. Also no one has the balls to start a coup or militia run takeover anymore, you could effectively with a small number of devoted and selfless men take over a country overnight. Almost everyone is too much of a pussy to do this though so alas it may never happen.

What exactly is national socialiaSm

that'd take too long to explain

What’s a good source to read on it

read a squires trial

Ifhtv

Ight*

Bet

Mein Kampf would be good

Squires Trial is meh

Not bad for a beginners book

But for an introduction to the groundworks that is only a 50ish page read is Squires Trial

I remember the leader of the American Indian movement russell means mentioning reservations are proof of socialism failing

So is it kinda like the rezs basically

I think Stanley G. payne stuff isn't too bad. it's a more academic approach to trying to know what fascism and nacional socialism is. It's always hard because the doctrine is post-hoc

Kek I technically have a Nazi tat but it was suppose to be the medicine wheel and my cuz fucked it up to be funny

Minimum numbers to maintain a police state is actually very high

continue @ＩＶ ＬＩ Ｖ Ｓ

I would say that most revolutions do not attempt to enforce any rule of law themselves

the winning strategy due to low manpower is rather to cause unrest and allow the existing state to be bled dry enforcing their own police state

eventually they can take over the seat of power and find enough resentment among the people to get support from them