Message from @Da_Fish
Discord ID: 475730107890139149
Imagine not living in America and not having basic rights
If we assume social contract theory then yeah the Constitution would be a social contract of some sort. There's nothing to suppose that the initial contract can't temporally spread out to be valid across generations
π π π
Who voted for it..it was brought by violence
Our current state was brought by violence
Locke was just wrong
Dont go to Unite the Right 2
btw
Hobbes was right
please
dont go
LOLOL
donβt tell me what to do
I can't anyway
Have a vacation planned for then
You are making right wing look like retards
if you go
@Deleted User where
if i want to get in to street brawls well then ill get in to street brawls
Idiot
thatβs why ill wear civnat and ancap stuff π π π
Well that's kinda the point. It's pretty unfeasible to get each new generation to verbally or consciously reaffirm the contract. People reaffirm it by inheriting, accepting, and living out its precepts. The whole point is that some violence must be done to ensure a functional society, if by violence you simply mean against one's will. But i dont accept that definition. Violence to me is conflict with ambiguity and there really is no ambiguity nor conflict when people implicitly accept the contract.
there is unironically nothing wrong with street brawls as long as you donβt instigate it
marching through streets is an essential part of all respectable movements
Brawlers will be flogged. Change my mind
Wyoming
Western vacation....like Westworld!
π
You're so jealous
Not only is it unfeasible...it never happened initially!!!!!!!
It's a myth
Like I said it was created by raw power
Not lockean contractual permission
That never ever happened
youll never get to a point where you can flog anyone without a few brawls
So we have a foundational myth of social contract
Locke is almost used as a cover up
For reality
A facade
Weekly (I think) reminder that socialism is the best system to achieve fair pay for all, and stop the media-slave state.