Try reading John Locke he's a Pie in the Sky Fantasy having philosopher totally untethered to reality totally ungrounded to the defensive nature that Western Civilization needed to have completely divorced from geopolitics and reality

with the writing of the consitutions

that’s like saying marx founded the ussr

You know what he meant

His pretty little rationalizations... Have shown themselves to be nonsensical in the modern world

And only barely made sense in the homogeneous states that he lived in in his time

yeah i knew what he meant and i said it’s wrong

Lmao

I can grant that he could not have foreseen multiculturalism but now we have seen it so we can't be so stupid

The problem with Lockeanism is that its state of nature never existed nor could ever exist

Social contract theory is big gay

why

Right

Social Contract is necessary

you need some order

Because people dont consciously come together to set up a society. Lockeanism assumes that the state of nature is actually kind of peaceful but it isnt. Civilization exists because violence is the fundamental problem plaguing humanity. People dont "come together" and agree on things in the sense of consciously willing this. They are pretty much forced

You have to understand it's limitations

As if the Constitution is a social contract

Imagine not living in America and not having basic rights

If we assume social contract theory then yeah the Constitution would be a social contract of some sort. There's nothing to suppose that the initial contract can't temporally spread out to be valid across generations

👌 😂 👌

Who voted for it..it was brought by violence

Our current state was brought by violence

Locke was just wrong

Dont go to Unite the Right 2

btw

Hobbes was right

please

dont go

LOLOL

don’t tell me what to do

I can't anyway

Have a vacation planned for then

You are making right wing look like retards

if you go

@Deleted User where

if i want to get in to street brawls well then ill get in to street brawls

Idiot

You will make everyone in your movement look bad

that’s why ill wear civnat and ancap stuff 👌 😂 👌

Well that's kinda the point. It's pretty unfeasible to get each new generation to verbally or consciously reaffirm the contract. People reaffirm it by inheriting, accepting, and living out its precepts. The whole point is that some violence must be done to ensure a functional society, if by violence you simply mean against one's will. But i dont accept that definition. Violence to me is conflict with ambiguity and there really is no ambiguity nor conflict when people implicitly accept the contract.