As if the Constitution is a social contract

Imagine not living in America and not having basic rights

If we assume social contract theory then yeah the Constitution would be a social contract of some sort. There's nothing to suppose that the initial contract can't temporally spread out to be valid across generations

👌 😂 👌

Who voted for it..it was brought by violence

Our current state was brought by violence

Locke was just wrong

Dont go to Unite the Right 2

btw

Hobbes was right

please

dont go

LOLOL

don’t tell me what to do

I can't anyway

Have a vacation planned for then

You are making right wing look like retards

if you go

@Deleted User where

if i want to get in to street brawls well then ill get in to street brawls

Idiot

You will make everyone in your movement look bad

that’s why ill wear civnat and ancap stuff 👌 😂 👌

Well that's kinda the point. It's pretty unfeasible to get each new generation to verbally or consciously reaffirm the contract. People reaffirm it by inheriting, accepting, and living out its precepts. The whole point is that some violence must be done to ensure a functional society, if by violence you simply mean against one's will. But i dont accept that definition. Violence to me is conflict with ambiguity and there really is no ambiguity nor conflict when people implicitly accept the contract.

there is unironically nothing wrong with street brawls as long as you don’t instigate it

marching through streets is an essential part of all respectable movements

Brawlers will be flogged. Change my mind

Wyoming

Western vacation....like Westworld!

😁

You're so jealous

Not only is it unfeasible...it never happened initially!!!!!!!

It's a myth

Like I said it was created by raw power

Not lockean contractual permission

That never ever happened

youll never get to a point where you can flog anyone without a few brawls

So we have a foundational myth of social contract

Locke is almost used as a cover up

For reality

A facade