you were wrong about every point of contention so you devolve into strawmans, non sequiturs and the like

l8r virgin

Calm down commie. Maybe, using the capitalist discord will cause you a heartache

What exactlyare you two talking about?

Well, he is trying me to sell a shill's research who earns money by espousing government intervention

@Vilhelmsson just scroll up, he won't tell you what really happened

and i mean scroll all the way up to the point on aristocracy and trade liberalization

Yes, and also see his "economists", rofl

> Take money from UN
> Pushes UN agenda
> Criticises big businesses for doing that
😂

literally nothing to do with anything said

nice ad hominem

Oh, now the truth is out. Run away and scurry to globalists. Ok, bud

the fact you tear from the analysis that show that child labor was a clear symptom of NO beneficiaries of the liberalization to the poor to just attacking a mentioned economist is silly

Analysis? Where you just quoted shills? Lol

Christiaan Grootaert; Harry Anthony Patrinos (1999). The Policy Analysis of Child Labour: A Comparative Study. Palgrave Macmillan.
ISBN - 978-0312221225

Brown, D. K., Deardorff, A. V. and Stern, R. M. Child Labour: Theory, Evidence, and Policy (Chapter 3, International Labour Standards: History, Theory, and Policy Options)
ISBN - 9781405105552.

these are the citations behind the macroeconomic analysis

use the ISBN if you want to search for the actual documents to read

rather than just the citations

Lol. You do expect me to read papers by these shills, without giving any reason why. Lol.
We don't need to look into the research. We can just look at the raw data. It is available.
It would help you if instead of relying on others, you saw raw data yourself, and made up your own mind.

you've shown me no raw data

and any socioeconomic factor involved disagrees with you

the poor benefitted so immensely that children had to be employed for almost 20 hours a day

damn!

20 hours, lol. They didn't die?
It is impossible for people to work 20 hours a day. Again, more lies.

a lot of them did die

and had massive amounts of health issues

Buddy, no one worked 20 hours. It is impossible, especially for children.

but they did

which is why there are regulations against it now

They cannot so it is impossible they did. It is a physical impossibility

history stands against your baseless premise

you cant ignore reals with feels sorry

Science stands against your Marxist assertion

Thanks heavens, you did not say 25 hours a day

the Cotton Mills Act, which a nascent form of regulation cut the allowed hours for those aged 9-16 to 16 hours a day

literally nothing you say is right

you just deny history when it suits you

That is work hours. Do you understand difference between work hours, and actual hours worked?

Hours a day

Kids would often work 12 hour night shifts

In glass making kids could typically work from 5 pm to 3 am