Message from @PebbЛe

Discord ID: 513440594509692928


2018-11-17 19:42:04 UTC  

Christiaan Grootaert; Harry Anthony Patrinos (1999). The Policy Analysis of Child Labour: A Comparative Study. Palgrave Macmillan.
ISBN - 978-0312221225

Brown, D. K., Deardorff, A. V. and Stern, R. M. Child Labour: Theory, Evidence, and Policy (Chapter 3, International Labour Standards: History, Theory, and Policy Options)
ISBN - 9781405105552.

2018-11-17 19:42:42 UTC  

these are the citations behind the macroeconomic analysis

2018-11-17 19:43:17 UTC  

use the ISBN if you want to search for the actual documents to read

2018-11-17 19:43:26 UTC  

rather than just the citations

2018-11-17 19:44:44 UTC  

Lol. You do expect me to read papers by these shills, without giving any reason why. Lol.
We don't need to look into the research. We can just look at the raw data. It is available.
It would help you if instead of relying on others, you saw raw data yourself, and made up your own mind.

2018-11-17 19:45:07 UTC  

you've shown me no raw data

2018-11-17 19:45:14 UTC  

and any socioeconomic factor involved disagrees with you

2018-11-17 19:45:33 UTC  

the poor benefitted so immensely that children had to be employed for almost 20 hours a day

2018-11-17 19:45:38 UTC  

damn!

2018-11-17 19:46:21 UTC  

20 hours, lol. They didn't die?
It is impossible for people to work 20 hours a day. Again, more lies.

2018-11-17 19:46:38 UTC  

a lot of them did die

2018-11-17 19:46:43 UTC  

and had massive amounts of health issues

2018-11-17 19:47:00 UTC  

Buddy, no one worked 20 hours. It is impossible, especially for children.

2018-11-17 19:47:13 UTC  

but they did

2018-11-17 19:47:19 UTC  

which is why there are regulations against it now

2018-11-17 19:47:45 UTC  

They cannot so it is impossible they did. It is a physical impossibility

2018-11-17 19:48:06 UTC  

history stands against your baseless premise

2018-11-17 19:48:17 UTC  

you cant ignore reals with feels sorry

2018-11-17 19:48:22 UTC  

Science stands against your Marxist assertion

2018-11-17 19:48:34 UTC  

Thanks heavens, you did not say 25 hours a day

2018-11-17 19:49:36 UTC  

the Cotton Mills Act, which a nascent form of regulation cut the allowed hours for those aged 9-16 to 16 hours a day

2018-11-17 19:49:46 UTC  

literally nothing you say is right

2018-11-17 19:50:03 UTC  

you just deny history when it suits you

2018-11-17 19:50:07 UTC  

That is work hours. Do you understand difference between work hours, and actual hours worked?

2018-11-17 19:51:28 UTC  

Hours a day

2018-11-17 19:51:42 UTC  

Kids would often work 12 hour night shifts

2018-11-17 19:52:11 UTC  

In glass making kids could typically work from 5 pm to 3 am

2018-11-17 19:52:34 UTC  

You have nothing to base anything you said off of except "science"

2018-11-17 19:52:35 UTC  

So, that is a 10 hour schedule.

2018-11-17 19:52:42 UTC  

And you said 20 hours

2018-11-17 19:52:50 UTC  

Ok

2018-11-17 19:53:11 UTC  

It wasn't all the same occupation and the glass making example was after further legislation

2018-11-17 19:53:53 UTC  

You cannot get your facts straight, lol.
Children worked 12-15 hours before legislation

2018-11-17 19:53:54 UTC  

The fact that the cotton mills act restricted those child laborers to 16 hours a day shows that it was higher

2018-11-17 19:54:05 UTC  

They were paid a decent wage.

2018-11-17 19:54:14 UTC  

They were not paid a decent wage

2018-11-17 19:54:28 UTC  

The families were impoverished and they all worked closer to 80 hours a week

2018-11-17 19:54:57 UTC  

In today's money, they'd be earning $2000 annually

2018-11-17 19:55:19 UTC  

Which is a lot for such an unskilled work

2018-11-17 19:56:04 UTC  

That's next to nothing per month for expenses to live above poverty

2018-11-17 19:56:19 UTC  

If you are eight, it is a lot.