Lol. You do expect me to read papers by these shills, without giving any reason why. Lol.
We don't need to look into the research. We can just look at the raw data. It is available.
It would help you if instead of relying on others, you saw raw data yourself, and made up your own mind.

you've shown me no raw data

and any socioeconomic factor involved disagrees with you

the poor benefitted so immensely that children had to be employed for almost 20 hours a day

damn!

20 hours, lol. They didn't die?
It is impossible for people to work 20 hours a day. Again, more lies.

a lot of them did die

and had massive amounts of health issues

Buddy, no one worked 20 hours. It is impossible, especially for children.

but they did

which is why there are regulations against it now

They cannot so it is impossible they did. It is a physical impossibility

history stands against your baseless premise

you cant ignore reals with feels sorry

Science stands against your Marxist assertion

Thanks heavens, you did not say 25 hours a day

the Cotton Mills Act, which a nascent form of regulation cut the allowed hours for those aged 9-16 to 16 hours a day

literally nothing you say is right

you just deny history when it suits you

That is work hours. Do you understand difference between work hours, and actual hours worked?

Hours a day

Kids would often work 12 hour night shifts

In glass making kids could typically work from 5 pm to 3 am

You have nothing to base anything you said off of except "science"

So, that is a 10 hour schedule.

And you said 20 hours

Ok

It wasn't all the same occupation and the glass making example was after further legislation

You cannot get your facts straight, lol.
Children worked 12-15 hours before legislation

The fact that the cotton mills act restricted those child laborers to 16 hours a day shows that it was higher

They were paid a decent wage.

They were not paid a decent wage

The families were impoverished and they all worked closer to 80 hours a week

In today's money, they'd be earning $2000 annually

Which is a lot for such an unskilled work

That's next to nothing per month for expenses to live above poverty

If you are eight, it is a lot.

The money wasn't for the child it was for the family stupid

We just went over the macroeconomic reasoning

The demand side of child labor is for the seeking of a low paying informal economy

Kids died and had health issues by 20 with the things they did