Message from @PebbЛe

Discord ID: 513441673351659531


2018-11-17 19:47:13 UTC  

but they did

2018-11-17 19:47:19 UTC  

which is why there are regulations against it now

2018-11-17 19:47:45 UTC  

They cannot so it is impossible they did. It is a physical impossibility

2018-11-17 19:48:06 UTC  

history stands against your baseless premise

2018-11-17 19:48:17 UTC  

you cant ignore reals with feels sorry

2018-11-17 19:48:22 UTC  

Science stands against your Marxist assertion

2018-11-17 19:48:34 UTC  

Thanks heavens, you did not say 25 hours a day

2018-11-17 19:49:36 UTC  

the Cotton Mills Act, which a nascent form of regulation cut the allowed hours for those aged 9-16 to 16 hours a day

2018-11-17 19:49:46 UTC  

literally nothing you say is right

2018-11-17 19:50:03 UTC  

you just deny history when it suits you

2018-11-17 19:50:07 UTC  

That is work hours. Do you understand difference between work hours, and actual hours worked?

2018-11-17 19:51:28 UTC  

Hours a day

2018-11-17 19:51:42 UTC  

Kids would often work 12 hour night shifts

2018-11-17 19:52:11 UTC  

In glass making kids could typically work from 5 pm to 3 am

2018-11-17 19:52:34 UTC  

You have nothing to base anything you said off of except "science"

2018-11-17 19:52:35 UTC  

So, that is a 10 hour schedule.

2018-11-17 19:52:42 UTC  

And you said 20 hours

2018-11-17 19:52:50 UTC  

Ok

2018-11-17 19:53:11 UTC  

It wasn't all the same occupation and the glass making example was after further legislation

2018-11-17 19:53:53 UTC  

You cannot get your facts straight, lol.
Children worked 12-15 hours before legislation

2018-11-17 19:53:54 UTC  

The fact that the cotton mills act restricted those child laborers to 16 hours a day shows that it was higher

2018-11-17 19:54:05 UTC  

They were paid a decent wage.

2018-11-17 19:54:14 UTC  

They were not paid a decent wage

2018-11-17 19:54:28 UTC  

The families were impoverished and they all worked closer to 80 hours a week

2018-11-17 19:54:57 UTC  

In today's money, they'd be earning $2000 annually

2018-11-17 19:55:19 UTC  

Which is a lot for such an unskilled work

2018-11-17 19:56:04 UTC  

That's next to nothing per month for expenses to live above poverty

2018-11-17 19:56:19 UTC  

If you are eight, it is a lot.

2018-11-17 19:56:38 UTC  

The money wasn't for the child it was for the family stupid

2018-11-17 19:56:56 UTC  

We just went over the macroeconomic reasoning

2018-11-17 19:57:18 UTC  

The demand side of child labor is for the seeking of a low paying informal economy

2018-11-17 19:57:57 UTC  

Kids died and had health issues by 20 with the things they did

2018-11-17 19:58:17 UTC  

The poor had no immense benefit

2018-11-17 19:59:44 UTC  

Are you idiot? Children got around $2000 annually (in today's wages). It was extra of what their parents earned.
Your Marxist theories don't disprove facts

2018-11-17 20:02:27 UTC  

Except that the average salary of a man was 2350 and the children barely got 10% of that

2018-11-17 20:02:44 UTC  

Making it $235 annually for children

2018-11-17 20:03:13 UTC  

Very comparable to the 20¢ a day that child laborers get today

2018-11-17 20:03:42 UTC  

Ive yet to say anything Marxist which means it's about that time you again where you've exhausted all your dumb shit you say

2018-11-17 20:03:49 UTC  

I have to go though so toodles

2018-11-17 20:05:32 UTC  

Ok, Commie. Take your tears anywhere else😎

2018-11-17 20:06:18 UTC  

> _Literally crying why children were paid less than adults_