@PebbЛe makes sense, however what is its practicality. Enforced or willing. is it more of a optimal situation or something to be enforeced? Basically what im trying to say is would nations nevessarily be forced to cooperate for internationalism or rather would they be free to cooperate if they so choose?

Would such an ideological position also not mandate certain values be held by the nations?

In a way it seems, if my suspicions are corect, partly a step towards slipping into globalism, or the current EU.

Also Merkelstein has decided to make a statement about dissolving international boarders

in the EU

eh well see Poles are cucked as is

well prolyl fall for it

the retards

ill revolt then, reestablish monarchy and larp as an aristocrat until the US decides to free the country

Gucci

Just read all of this

And ur all against my political views

And youre all crazy

OwO

uwu

Fuck me Lenin

@Earl of Morrrrgantown

Fuck me daddi

@im gonna kachill my self No.

Oh

But I love u

uwu

@Earl of Morrrrgantown

<:PINGREE:459545653350105088>

@Vilhelmsson

@im gonna kachill my self

I'm bi

Btw

@Earl of Morrrrgantown

SAD

eww double degenerate

@im gonna kachill my self begome straight

Ok

(:

This server should have political parties fighting to see which one would win, and the leader to become like an uhhh, co-co-owner ?

@[ROMAN EMPIRE] let's do it

I shall found the National TRC Fascist Party

that actually happened before @[ROMAN EMPIRE] @The Big Oof

and i won

Who here runs the Twitter account with the name "Reactionary Coalition"?

YEEEE HAAAAAWWW GAMERS