Message from @Rob Travis (Mason)
Discord ID: 456323474579783682
you are being morally weak
being offended is a choice
by permitting them to do evil
your morals are not the same as mine
Is everything that must be forgiven "evil" then? Don't generalize.
yes?
if it's not evil, why would it need forgiven
If you're speaking purely within a religious context then sure, absolutely. Except religion isn't the real world.
Speaking materially you make no fucking sense.
every act is
1. good
2. bad
3. passive
only bad acts need forgiveness
I think hes confusing malice with evil
malice comes from evil tho
theft isnt inherently evil
its the principle
an evil act shouldnt be done
>depriving someone of what is rightfully theirs isn't evil
🤔
I would be willing to forgive someone who did an 'evil' act by accepting who hey are, for example, in the process of molding them into a better person. That is not permanent.
even if it does good, principle
it hurts
you just called a starving child stealing bread from a baker evil
we cant achieve the ideal
my point wasnt done
Or the bourgeoisie being killed by the proletariat. 😎
>be the bigger person
aka, let people walk all over you and have moral principles that are toppled by a slight breeze
the child did an evil act
prove me wrong
you can't
If your ideals are absolute you're asking to be moved on them anyways.
I can
the child was trying to survive
wtf josh is a socialist???? excess wealth should be redisributed!!!1?1?!1
the child did something evil to live
evil is too string a word the child did a bad thing but to jump straight to evil ignores the context
it must be done, but its never justified
>evil
>a strong word
only if you make it as such
taxes for example are necessary theft
>taxes
>necessary
not in my utopia :ancap:
evil is the worst form of bad there is
If you are making it such a watered down word when in English it's a very strong one you're either being intentionally or unintentionally intellectually dishonest within the context of your own made-up jargon.