its a point

I pointed up and said kek

either way:
you can't forgive someone when they do not want to be forgiven

Why not?

thats false

if you forgive someone who is not sorry for a deed

you are being morally weak

being offended is a choice

by permitting them to do evil

your morals are not the same as mine

Is everything that must be forgiven "evil" then? Don't generalize.

yes?

if it's not evil, why would it need forgiven

If you're speaking purely within a religious context then sure, absolutely. Except religion isn't the real world.

Speaking materially you make no fucking sense.

every act is
1. good
2. bad
3. passive

only bad acts need forgiveness

I think hes confusing malice with evil

malice comes from evil tho

theft isnt inherently evil

its the principle

an evil act shouldnt be done

>depriving someone of what is rightfully theirs isn't evil
🤔

I would be willing to forgive someone who did an 'evil' act by accepting who hey are, for example, in the process of molding them into a better person. That is not permanent.

even if it does good, principle

it hurts

but thats kinda the point god wants to make

you just called a starving child stealing bread from a baker evil

we cant achieve the ideal

my point wasnt done

Or the bourgeoisie being killed by the proletariat. 😎

>be the bigger person
aka, let people walk all over you and have moral principles that are toppled by a slight breeze

the child did an evil act

prove me wrong

you can't

If your ideals are absolute you're asking to be moved on them anyways.

I can

the child was trying to survive

wtf josh is a socialist???? excess wealth should be redisributed!!!1?1?!1

the child did something evil to live

evil is too string a word the child did a bad thing but to jump straight to evil ignores the context