Hitler opposed Social Democracy mate?

his part was literally the socdem party

it came from the DAP

He fought against them in his Venice and constriction days

He indentified them as a bunch of power hungry corrupters who poisoned the lower classes

yes that is how he viewed their inability to progress the gemeinschaft

but the SPD literally melted into the DAP and NSDAP

and he continued the economics of the SPD

Hitler directly believed everything the Social Democrats did was hurtful to the people

Why would he continue policies which he identified as hurtful to the people

He literally continued Bismarck's economic plan

He just universalized who the dividend goes to

from heavy industries

and so on

Nazi Germany was not Fascist, you Horse-shoeist

@L0GAN

I'm a Fascist myself, fyi

Germany had shit tons of Social programs and was war-driven

The only way to completely achieve Hitler's ideals was through war, and nothing else could be done about it

ofc Mussolini had his ideals about the new Roman Empire, but that was low on the bucket list when compared to everything else

But I'm talking too much about the iconic figureheads

NatSoc is Socially Nationalistic

That was the main thing of it

which a lot of people fail to realize

whilst Fascism is the Supremacy of the state with utmost loyalty to the nation, adhering to the ideals proposed in the DoF (Doctrines of Fascism), with no rules for exception, nor "tolerance" or "equality"

Fascist Italy didn't do that well from what I understand

Nazi Germany had mass privatization, but also strong market regulation and expanded social programs.

They sold a ton of state owned industries if I recall correctly

And nationalized alot

yeah, they nationalized Jewish businesses and things they needed for the war

for example

h

👽

they literally nationalized next to nothing

for peace time

@iowa hello there my dude

ive met you before

hey

whats up

literally watching paint dry

whys that