Message from @PebbЛe
Discord ID: 467871493779357706
it's a step further than similar
they're completely unrelated
natsoc's politics are pragmatic
meaning they can be anything that presents as pragmatic to the spiritual vanguard of the race
"pragmatic"
That's where I disagree
I'm reading Mein kampf currently, he definitely has ideology
it's the point of national socialism
natsocs are fascists lol
No they're not
S e p e r a t e
not even nazi germany could be considered fascist
it had very social democratic politics a la Bismarck
the first part is flat out wrong
the second part is okay
no it was very social democratic
insofar as labor participation and organization beside capital
it was practically Bismarck's economics on steroids
Hitler opposed Social Democracy mate?
his part was literally the socdem party
He fought against them in his Venice and constriction days
He indentified them as a bunch of power hungry corrupters who poisoned the lower classes
yes that is how he viewed their inability to progress the gemeinschaft
but the SPD literally melted into the DAP and NSDAP
and he continued the economics of the SPD
Hitler directly believed everything the Social Democrats did was hurtful to the people
Why would he continue policies which he identified as hurtful to the people
He literally continued Bismarck's economic plan
He just universalized who the dividend goes to
from heavy industries
and so on
Nazi Germany was not Fascist, you Horse-shoeist
I'm a Fascist myself, fyi
Germany had shit tons of Social programs and was war-driven
The only way to completely achieve Hitler's ideals was through war, and nothing else could be done about it
ofc Mussolini had his ideals about the new Roman Empire, but that was low on the bucket list when compared to everything else
But I'm talking too much about the iconic figureheads
NatSoc is Socially Nationalistic
That was the main thing of it