my neck and back

Probably because I played sea of theives for 13 hours straight

Because you're 80

sea of thieves got too hyped

like its a good game

but it got so much hype

It's a good fucken game

that it kinda died

like not ded

It's active

but not as popular anymore

its like overwatch

good game

overhyped

still a good active game

but signifigantly less popular

Eh

Both are games worth playing

Sea of theives would be fucking 10/10 if there were more ships/players per map

regarding <#479347111775830017>, does anyone know what's the difference between a classical republic and a modern one?

@Doctor Anon or more players per ship

It’s just not the same without zexy to torment

@grilomoto a modern republic basically means a representative democracy. Classical Republic means a mixed government, especially one that incorporates some form of all three types of governance: monarchy/dictator, aristocracy/oligarchy, and democracy.

The USA under the constitution was designed in the form of a classical republic, but has since moved to a modern republic

Modern Republics are cancer and lead to leftism and the degeneration of society

Classical republics are effective at preserving a nation until they compromise one of their core founding principles.

👌 thank you

Basically, he has a rose-coloured view of a Classical Republic, one that is referred to by the Romans as being great, but we forget ourselves, that the Roman Empire fell because the Nobility and Civilian governments couldn't get along, the Senate worked against each other, and everyone forgot about the people of the empire. Then the last emperor was killed by a "Barbarian" and they Senate fell apart, power struggles, etc. Then it collapsed.

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 your entire criticism is invalid since you are conflating the empire with the republic. By the time of the empire they had already compromised on core founding principles. So thank you for giving an example of what I was trying to say.

Sooooo... It still failed, and that's all I said. Regardless of what you think you're saying, or what I'm saying, it still fell apart. That's the unbiased truth. The Roman Empire fell.

empire, not republic

big difference between the two

So you're saying that they should have just stayed in their country?

no, the republic had conquered foreign nations

Then it was an Empire.

the empire was a different form of governance

it had an emperor

this is just historical illiteracy. The time period known as the roman empire is distinct from the republic

So you glorify the breaking of tradition and overthrow of the Monarchy in order to become the Republic?

And that only lasted few centuries.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/386689594604912652/490986413177700355/image0-2.png