Message from @Summī Imperator, 呪い殿
Discord ID: 491834140618915840
That's debatable
I think a farm that breeds for flavour would be much better.
Those are rare though.
ok, not the literal best. just in general
Well that's just due to the climate.
The growing zone.
The produce doesn't need to be bred to be hardy
Strange how the breeding process often has such an effect on the flavour.
that's what I'm saying. America has great zones for farming
To bad you squander it with poisons.
I believe subsidies encourage bad distribution of resources though
Also lack of crop rotation.
too much corn
too much soy
Sometimes that's all that will grow
government guarantees them money no matter if they over produce
that means they have no incentive to be careful with the land
Well, sounds like their own decisions.
Not the fault of the Government.
might as well exploit it to the maximum amount to get as much out of the government as possible
it is in their self interest to do it
Yes
So it's greed, ultimately, that is the issue.
government has given them perverse incentives
Would you take the subsidies away and have the farmers just say it isn't worth it?
doesn't even have to be greed
They can't strike, but they can certainly retire.
if you could make a guaranteed amount of money now for greater security in the future, why wouldn't you do it?
It sounds like it is the people that are the problem, not the other way round.
Why's not be in favor of a more structured system?
it is in their own self interest
^
With more thought into it than "*Money.* **Money** ***Money!***"
They have to put their part in the system structure.
why not remove the perverse incentives, let farming fix itself by allowing farmers providing what people actually want
Because if they just do the same thing?
And make money exporting?
China and Japan love soybeans.
they couldn't, because over producing provides diminishing returns without a guaranteed amount fro the government
The grocer's there would most likely jump on cheap soy.