Actually this is false

enough with the theories and what SHOULD be

Collective farms for example we're collective, not public, property

They were owned by collectives, not the state

There were also co-operatives in the USSR

Three different kinds of property

State, Collectives and Co-Operatives, and during certain periods even private property existed

how does a collective own something

The entirety of who works the place makes decisions on how it will be run and such

hmm

So a democratic corporation?

In this case they still worked under commodity production so how the money they received from their products would be used was decided by meetings and such, if they were too large, likely by vote

Yeah I guess o was basically saying that

That seems wildly inefficient

In the case of state own industries they would election one of their co-workers to the soviets, actually I think all work places would election representatives to the soviets to represent them

Not really, considering the GDP nearly rivalled the USA on a number of occasions

Usually managers are elected as well

So it's not like bosses don't exist, it's that everyone have power in the work place and your boss is accountable to you

As a Marxist the existence of authority or a boss is not my concern

What's the point then

If the soviet system only ever rivaled the US

Clearly the US did something better

Better in what respect?

I wouldn't consider the disgusting amounts of over production by Capitalism "better"

But the US didn't collapse

And it wasn't an authoritarian dictatorship

Technically neither did the USSR

Oh the USSR wasn't a dictatorship either

The USSR never collapsed?

Both are Authoritarian however

No it was dissolved by Yeltsin

In fact a vote to keep the USSR had people vote in iver whelming numbers across all the SSRs and the RSFSR to maintain it

However the bureaucracy couldn't profit from the organization of the USSR and needed to open up the markets such that they could benefit

Ok cool

So the USSR was forcefully dissolved

But again if the capitalist system is just effective then why change it

Effective in what regard?

Currently the only argument is muh exploitation

I didn't get into how Capitalism collapses every ten years

Effective in every regard

Nonsense