Message from @Doctor Anon
Discord ID: 515293512732901377
though I'd rather stay out of the whole Rhodesia shit since I barely know anything about it
What if you took an alternate view. Instead of seeing it as black rule and white rule, look at it as capitalist rule and Marxist rule?
why does it simply have to be Marxist rule?
Because logically, wouldn't the economic decline be based off of economic reasons?
Hence, wouldn't the economic problems be better viewed as capitalism vs. Marxism rather than white vs. black?
@MinecraftMemer They are poor with money, so any system you give them
It won't work
Immigration makes this worse
I don't understand.
If you Import the few intellectual and economically upper class Africans from another country, After time passes it destroys the African country as they are devoid of those who can innovate and invest. Eventually the poor Africans come in as economic refugees, and then Everything is fucked.
I don't see how poor people destroy a country.
Unless you are using redistribution, poor people at worst do nothing.
Because poor people are bad with money
They can't innovate and invest
They are essentially dead weight
But they don't go out of their way to harm the economy.
They harm it regardless of their intentions
And how do they harm it?
By existing?
But welfare and aid are because governments and cultures CHOOSE to pursue welfare and aid.
Those are leftist economic choices, not intrinsic to the poor.
@MinecraftMemer in attempt to lift them out of poorness so they can contribute to the economy
If we do nothing, they won't harm the economy.
They'll just remain poor.
It lowers the social health
So the issue isn't welfare?
Which is proven to reduce morale
Welfare is an issue because it doesn't sufficiently lift people out of poverty
Therefore it's a misallocation of money and resources
So then why have welfare in the first place?
It's a waste
@MinecraftMemer because it's good for re-election
So you're suggesting elections are the problems?
I prefer job fairs over welfare
Elections are a problem yes
Temporarily anyways
Democracy is dangerous to competent statecraft because it forces every political decision to be lowered to a level of stupidity that the masses can understand.
If welfare is intrinsic to democracies, then it would be logical to have a different style of government.
In that case, we would have monarchies.