Message from @Similar Scowl
Discord ID: 522492369979834399
the real question is: is there political will to actually go after the president for an alleged illegal action? at the time apparently not
"in active "hostilities""
How is that not active hostilities
US planes literally conducting sorties
Similar ScowlToday at 19:14
the real question is: is there political will to actually go after the president for an alleged illegal action? at the time apparently not
ahaha yes
very soon
You would only worsen the situation
the point is that the obama administration found a loophole in the definition
The citizens could turn on the government
that allowed them to argue that it wasnt hostilities
Yes loophole doesn't mean it's legal
I think we'll find out soon enough
but
"this was precisely the position taken by the White House … even though at the time US planes were dropping bombs in Libya, firing missiles from off-shore and, according to some reports, coordinating with British forward air controllers on the ground. Only by the most tortured definition do such actions not qualify as hostilities."
i'd side with you, but obama's legal team found a way to go around the thing lol
hmmm
anyway
wanna see something interesting?
whats this
read it
Someone high profile has been convicted
and they can't be reported currently
one of many arrests to begin
i think i know about this
i think there is a similar law in the UK
Ah
that basically allows for on going judicial processes to remain secret until they are through
it was George Pell
@Similar Scowl Economic debate?
is there anything to debate
i imagine i'd agree with you on most stuff
idk what do you believe
i think i'm a centrist in economy lol
though i'm more inclined towards free market
there should be some regulations to protect workers
and then i think the state should have protectionist measures for essential industries in the country, like infrastructure
What regulations
as in just an example or so