Message from @Lola
Discord ID: 522491739416559647
notifying is different from asking permission
Do you think it's reasonable to deny access to family and friends in another country
basically the WPR says that the president has to send a letter to congress 2 days after war starts saying: "oh btw we're at war now, cya later"
Her'es the actually quote
"It provides that the U.S. President can send U.S. Armed Forces into action abroad only by declaration of war by Congress, "statutory authorization," or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."
It wouldn't be reasonable to recreate this kind of situation
```President Obama found an out in the law; namely that he can bypass the requirements of the WPR if the US is not engaged in active "hostilities". This was precisely the position taken by the White House … even though at the time US planes were dropping bombs in Libya, firing missiles from off-shore and, according to some reports, coordinating with British forward air controllers on the ground. Only by the most tortured definition do such actions not qualify as hostilities. Indeed Obama's own office of legal counsel determined that US actions represented "hostilities" and required congressional authorization to continue. They were overruled by the president.``` the article says that even though that there were hostilities, clearly, they found a way of itnerpretation of the definition of "hostilities" that allowed it to be bypassed - a loophole if you will
the real question is: is there political will to actually go after the president for an alleged illegal action? at the time apparently not
"in active "hostilities""
How is that not active hostilities
US planes literally conducting sorties
Similar ScowlToday at 19:14
the real question is: is there political will to actually go after the president for an alleged illegal action? at the time apparently not
ahaha yes
very soon
You would only worsen the situation
the point is that the obama administration found a loophole in the definition
that allowed them to argue that it wasnt hostilities
Yes loophole doesn't mean it's legal
I think we'll find out soon enough
but
"this was precisely the position taken by the White House … even though at the time US planes were dropping bombs in Libya, firing missiles from off-shore and, according to some reports, coordinating with British forward air controllers on the ground. Only by the most tortured definition do such actions not qualify as hostilities."
i'd side with you, but obama's legal team found a way to go around the thing lol
hmmm
anyway
wanna see something interesting?
shoot
whats this
read it
Someone high profile has been convicted
and they can't be reported currently
one of many arrests to begin
i think i know about this
i think there is a similar law in the UK
Ah
that basically allows for on going judicial processes to remain secret until they are through