That's because it is DotP
so you are a communist at some degree
I have a different take on Anarchism than most Anarchists. I'm a class struggle Anarchist with lots of LibMarx inspiration
ok!
have you read state and the revolution?
could be interesting for you if you haven't
DotP under Libertarian Marxist institutions fits within the Anarchist critique of unjustified hierarchy. As long as it can be dismantled by the masses at their will, it's justified
yeah, well that's marxism for you
it's litteraly how it works
like cultural revolution
dismantling the hierarchy to impeach the nomenklatura from taking place
like in the USSR post stalin
I think you are closer to Mao Spontex than anarchism
which is the libertarian version of MLM
Life is Struggle
^
Fascism embraces this in its life style
Fascism is bullshit
I still describe myself as Anarchist. Just more of an original kind
>communist saying this
yeah well I think you might have to rebrand it since you are very different from most anarchists
Protracted people's war is based tho
Fascism failedway harder than all socialist states
Mussolini is a better Pinata than leader
Just not a huge fan of partisan politics. Which is what separates me from most Marxists
>being destroyed by outside forces is worse than causing self-collapse
Fascists lost the only real war they fought
hence the Mao Spontex way, which distances itself from parties and wants a more autonomous form of ML
with the Mass Line as principal strategy
At least communists and fascists achieved something, unlike anarchists.
If you disclude Franco of course
Historical Anarchists didn't have a solid Revolutionary theory
Fascist only achieved misery, lost war and mass crimes
Socialism achieved a better society for its people
And the USSR (great and glorious as it was) didn't?
yeah
they didn't
They did have a Revolutionary theory
It wasn't a great one, but arguably it was one
USSR achieved better life and it got ruined by revisionism and the nomenklatura
from Corn Man to Gorby
