Jewish plots don't exist. I used to be Jewish and can first-hand confirm Jewish rabbis aren't plotting shit. If anything, rabbis are wise on morality but stupid when it comes to politics

I'm not a Jew

Yeah it's not a cult

"let's all read a scroll and plot global domination"

No it's not

The Torah sucks ass and most Jews disagree with 60% of it's bullshit

No you don't

That Jew is stupid

Exactly

Jewish conspiracy theories are pretty stupid. Flat Earth is more feasible

Jewish bankers and CEOs exist. So what? There are Christian and Muslim CEOs, and Christians essentially rule the world

Well, they do

Or huge parts of it at least

Christian organizations still pay off bureaucrats

Yeah, because Liberalism is the shit. Christian organizations now just pitch up a rainbow flag to get money from a liberalized populace. Christian organizations are run like businesses

When I say "the shit" I mean "the norm"

I personally hate Liberalism

Liberalism is just Capitalism with a rainbow

Bitch, Anarchists hate Liberals. Liberals literally take any stance previously Anarchist or Socialist and turn it into a marketing campaign

Liberals steal from us bro

Anarchists and Socialists literally started progressivism, they just use it to make money

No. I'm. Not.

Calling me a liberal doesn't make me one. Idealistically, the only thing me and Liberals have in common is the fact we aren't Authoritarians. Other than that, we're different asf. Liberal are fake in every sense of the word. Hell, they aren't even progressive.

Yes

I believe in Individuals being able to rule themselves

Liberals don't believe that. They have faith in their partisan politics n shit

No, the society is a reflection of the Individuals, not Individuals being a reflection of society

I understand where you're coming from with your claim however

No, because my idea of a society is different to which the rules of that interaction don't apply. Society is a reflection of the masses, in which decisions and policies are made by all Individuals in said society through Consensus. That means the gay couple would have a say in how the society is run and the policies that affect them. Because of this, more human interaction and communication between different peoples is required. Intolerance for things such as homosexuality would therefore decrease, given interaction between homosexuals and non-homosexuals would be necessary. Social Conservatism is a biproduct of a vertically organized society, in which different hierarchial units compete and utilize different methods of keeping power, including divide and conquer. The system behind a Liberal society is the same as every other: hierarchy still exists, Social Conservatism will exist to a degree. Horizontal Organization requires social tolerance to thrive, and success in said society isn't done through Competition but cooperation. That means cooperating with various groups and peoples is required to better our current material and social conditions. Information about different cultures and the exchange of knowledge on such a radical scale will kill the whole idea of intolerance. So, essentially what you think Anarchy is isn't what it is. It's not bound by the Human relation laws that vertical organization inherently possesses, it's an entirely different system in on it's own. Liberalism runs in the same system as everyone else, just with more pressure on tolerance. The biproduct of a society, such as Capitalism and the State, which require Competition to better our conditions, is greed, and greed requires intolerance. The biproduct of the Anarchist horizontal method isn't greed. Cooperation is required to better our condition, which is the goal for every Human to achieve. Therefore, intolerance would be scarce within years.

Liberalism and Anarchism have similarities on social positions, but what completely separates them are the systems these goals are achieved in.

But, it isn't Liberalism because you say it is. That comment only shows me you understand very little about what Liberalism actually is, how it works, and it's goals. Anarchism obviously struggles for Individual liberty, how this is done is DIFFERENT from liberalism. An ideology isn't determined by it's goals, but by it's methods to achieve them

Goals are only half the battle

The goals of Communism and Anarchism are systemically identical. How they are achieved is different, making them different ideologies altogether

No, it isn't

I think Anarchists need a Revolutionary theory that is more planned out than some fucking insurrection

You LITERALLY can't have ANY revolution without a bit of authority bro

Even an Anarchist Revolution needs some authority

Anarchism is a critique of unjustified hierarchy. I'm pretty sure a temporary revokable Revolutionary council is justified

No it isn't. Revolution is a struggle

Struggles need coordination and planning

It isn't

That's because it is DotP

I have a different take on Anarchism than most Anarchists. I'm a class struggle Anarchist with lots of LibMarx inspiration

DotP under Libertarian Marxist institutions fits within the Anarchist critique of unjustified hierarchy. As long as it can be dismantled by the masses at their will, it's justified

^

I still describe myself as Anarchist. Just more of an original kind

Protracted people's war is based tho

Just not a huge fan of partisan politics. Which is what separates me from most Marxists

Fascists lost the only real war they fought

If you disclude Franco of course

Historical Anarchists didn't have a solid Revolutionary theory

They did have a Revolutionary theory

It wasn't a great one, but arguably it was one

The USSR failed because some of that shit was inherent to a system that's centralized. Marxist-Leninists can learn from this mistake. If you fail, learn where you went wrong and try again

China is just Social Democracy with a fetish for red at this point

Nazi Germany only produced benefits for those that were Aryan and members of the party

True

@Lotus Calme that doesn't automatically make it a good thing

The EU is a clusterfuck

Europe will fall to staunch nationalism, not Leftism. That's only because of the current political climate right now

France will likely be more Lefty tho

The workers are militant there

@Lotus Calme not all

@Deleted User you do have a great point

Oof

^^^