No, because my idea of a society is different to which the rules of that interaction don't apply. Society is a reflection of the masses, in which decisions and policies are made by all Individuals in said society through Consensus. That means the gay couple would have a say in how the society is run and the policies that affect them. Because of this, more human interaction and communication between different peoples is required. Intolerance for things such as homosexuality would therefore decrease, given interaction between homosexuals and non-homosexuals would be necessary. Social Conservatism is a biproduct of a vertically organized society, in which different hierarchial units compete and utilize different methods of keeping power, including divide and conquer. The system behind a Liberal society is the same as every other: hierarchy still exists, Social Conservatism will exist to a degree. Horizontal Organization requires social tolerance to thrive, and success in said society isn't done through Competition but cooperation. That means cooperating with various groups and peoples is required to better our current material and social conditions. Information about different cultures and the exchange of knowledge on such a radical scale will kill the whole idea of intolerance. So, essentially what you think Anarchy is isn't what it is. It's not bound by the Human relation laws that vertical organization inherently possesses, it's an entirely different system in on it's own. Liberalism runs in the same system as everyone else, just with more pressure on tolerance. The biproduct of a society, such as Capitalism and the State, which require Competition to better our conditions, is greed, and greed requires intolerance. The biproduct of the Anarchist horizontal method isn't greed. Cooperation is required to better our condition, which is the goal for every Human to achieve. Therefore, intolerance would be scarce within years.
