Message from @[Lex]
Discord ID: 454066331042578463
@[Lex] right, so if we use the Obama years as an example we're screwed
Because we made history in 2010
The 2nd largest swing since WWII in the house
Don't get too sad in here guys
@Winston But still...
Even though that's fantastic
Like anon says there
No one knows the true story
because the cable news is lying to them
Truth finds a way
@zakattack04 The swing won't be anywhere near that big.
I assure you.
This won't even be a 2006.
This'll be close.
@[Lex] lmao dude.
The watch dog party always has higher turnout
very true.
they're on a tear with recent elections
Looking worse than a regualr midterm
don't think so.
Yes
The average house swing for the first midterm
is 32 seats
i would've said otherwise before these californian elections
According to Paul Ryan^
Furthermore, Republicans lost their incumbent advantage in many of the competitive districts
I think 22 republicans have retired or resigned already
We have a 23 seat majority
red meat for some Colorado faggots?
26 tossups. in order for the democrats to win the majority, they need to win 18 of the 26 tossups, provided the republican leans/likely republican flip
those tossups will now have been reduced by around 5-6 and have become lean/likely republicans
they'll need all twenty tossups to win a 1-2 seat majority
You need to eat into those lean/likely gop seats in order for the Democrats to win.
lol, it won't be 32 seats.
I bet your mother on it
Yeah, I have it at 26 tossups