Message from @Winston
Discord ID: 454063074001944577
@🎃Boo-ton🎃 I swear you blackpill despite knowing better.
What could have possibly influenced that turnout disparity, Button?
Perhaps it's because a Democrat was in the WH?
We already KNOW Democratic turnout will rise. It's just a matter of HOW MUCH.
And whether it'll be enough to unseat all/most vulnerable GOP seats in the state.
Right, TX won't flip until 2024
But based on last night's result,
We're going to lose CA-49, NJ-02, and the odds of losing NJ-11 have doubled
@🎃Boo-ton🎃 this graph must be fake
Because RS told me right wing is on the rise
@[Lex] right, so if we use the Obama years as an example we're screwed
Because we made history in 2010
The 2nd largest swing since WWII in the house
Don't get too sad in here guys
@Winston But still...
Even though that's fantastic
Like anon says there
No one knows the true story
because the cable news is lying to them
@zakattack04 The swing won't be anywhere near that big.
I assure you.
This won't even be a 2006.
This'll be close.
@[Lex] lmao dude.
The watch dog party always has higher turnout
very true.
they're on a tear with recent elections
but will it be enough to unseat the significant gop majority?
Looking worse than a regualr midterm
don't think so.
Yes
The average house swing for the first midterm
is 32 seats
i would've said otherwise before these californian elections
According to Paul Ryan^
Furthermore, Republicans lost their incumbent advantage in many of the competitive districts
I think 22 republicans have retired or resigned already
We have a 23 seat majority