We already KNOW Democratic turnout will rise. It's just a matter of HOW MUCH.

And whether it'll be enough to unseat all/most vulnerable GOP seats in the state.

Right, TX won't flip until 2024
But based on last night's result,

We're going to lose CA-49, NJ-02, and the odds of losing NJ-11 have doubled

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 this graph must be fake

Because RS told me right wing is on the rise

@[Lex] right, so if we use the Obama years as an example we're screwed

Because we made history in 2010

The 2nd largest swing since WWII in the house

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jun/06/donald-trump-justin-trudeau-burning-down-white-house-tariffs

Don't get too sad in here guys

@Winston But still...

Even though that's fantastic

Like anon says there

No one knows the true story

because the cable news is lying to them

Truth finds a way

@zakattack04 The swing won't be anywhere near that big.

I assure you.

This won't even be a 2006.

This'll be close.

@[Lex] lmao dude.

The watch dog party always has higher turnout

very true.

they're on a tear with recent elections

but will it be enough to unseat the significant gop majority?

Looking worse than a regualr midterm

don't think so.

Yes

The average house swing for the first midterm

is 32 seats

i would've said otherwise before these californian elections

According to Paul Ryan^

Furthermore, Republicans lost their incumbent advantage in many of the competitive districts

I think 22 republicans have retired or resigned already

We have a 23 seat majority

red meat for some Colorado faggots?

26 tossups. in order for the democrats to win the majority, they need to win 18 of the 26 tossups, provided the republican leans/likely republican flip

those tossups will now have been reduced by around 5-6 and have become lean/likely republicans