Message from @Den

Discord ID: 419232695445487636


2018-03-02 20:15:02 UTC  

Useful stuff

2018-03-02 20:16:10 UTC  

I don't want to say who he was working for because I don't want to dox myself.

2018-03-02 20:18:22 UTC  

@Den Is there a day when you can visit the rural areas

2018-03-02 20:18:27 UTC  

can you say if he was working for the Dems

2018-03-02 20:19:24 UTC  

LOL! No he isn't working for the Dems. I don't break bread with heathens

2018-03-02 20:19:46 UTC  

Fucking Unclean!!!!!

2018-03-02 20:19:50 UTC  

lel

2018-03-02 20:19:57 UTC  

Did he give any reasons for why Rick might lose?

2018-03-02 20:21:34 UTC  

The suppressed turnout from the redistricting combined with the fact that it's low turnout overall and there is a small percentage of Dems that are highly motivated. That is all it takes in these special elections. If Lamb wins though he WILL lose in November

2018-03-02 20:30:43 UTC  

Lamb isnt a bad guy tho compared to other Dems

2018-03-02 20:31:01 UTC  

this is true,

2018-03-02 20:31:13 UTC  

the way PA is redrawn, Lamb would lose in Nov

2018-03-02 20:31:21 UTC  

_if_ he wins this month

2018-03-02 20:32:40 UTC  

The problem is that I think it will help motivate Dems like Alabama did. Fucking Brannon really did a ton of damage with the loss of that seat.

2018-03-02 20:34:01 UTC  

If Strangw would have gotten that nominee the Dems would have lost and lost a ton of momentum.

2018-03-02 20:38:42 UTC  

@Den it hasn't even been redistrict'd yet though

2018-03-02 20:39:36 UTC  

But people aren't voting if they don't even know what district they will be in a few months.

2018-03-02 20:39:46 UTC  

@Den I wouldn't blame Bannon

2018-03-02 20:39:51 UTC  

I'd blame McConnell and the GOPe

2018-03-02 20:39:59 UTC  

hashtagdontblamethevictim

2018-03-02 20:41:03 UTC  

Any GOP Senator from Alabama would have supported Trump 95% of the time. Moore was way too divisive. He barely won his SCOTUS seat which is pathetic in Alabama

2018-03-02 20:41:32 UTC  

Strange would have been fine

2018-03-02 20:44:48 UTC  

I'm still wondering why people think Bannon is responsible for Moore winning in the primaries

2018-03-02 20:45:37 UTC  

Well he backed him. Also a lot of people say that Brannon was leaking stuff about Moore to the media after he won the Primary

2018-03-02 20:45:48 UTC  

But who knows if it's true

2018-03-02 20:47:29 UTC  

People had this perception that Bannon was trying to make Trump's electoral agenda better outside the white house, and that Moore was part of that. After Moore lost and Trump publicly bashed Bannon, it became apparent that wasn't the case.

2018-03-02 20:51:54 UTC  

I think Moore would still have won the primaries without Bannon's endorsement

2018-03-02 21:01:58 UTC  

Yeah I think Bannon really spread the false message that the GOP was trying to undermine Trump. It was untue but if it wasn't for traitors who sunk Obamacare repel like McCain the idea would not have found traction. Plenty of blame to go around

2018-03-02 21:02:21 UTC  

It wasn't just Bannon.

2018-03-02 21:02:32 UTC  

isn't the GOP trying to undermine him though?

2018-03-02 21:03:00 UTC  

yeah, GOP senators and congressmen seem to vote with him frequently enough

2018-03-02 21:03:16 UTC  

but during the 2016 election they pulled all sorts of BS to try to sabotage Trump

2018-03-02 21:04:07 UTC  

Yeah but now that he gave them the Rust Belt it's not advantageous to them. They thought he would lose. Look at the scotes

2018-03-02 21:04:27 UTC  

The problem is they have too few numbers in the Senate

2018-03-02 21:05:08 UTC  

here's the thing I noticed,

2018-03-02 21:05:19 UTC  

in the last 4 midterm elections,

2018-03-02 21:05:23 UTC  

(all of them)

2018-03-02 21:06:20 UTC  

the party that was leading in the generic ballot never won by the projected margin

2018-03-02 21:06:25 UTC  

for instance,

2018-03-02 21:06:33 UTC  

in 2014,