Message from @FLanon

Discord ID: 422830748064677918


2018-03-12 18:52:23 UTC  

Is that a good size sample?

2018-03-12 18:53:00 UTC  

I honestly don't trust polls at all anymore. Virginia said dem would win by 3, (won by 11). Alabama said Moore would win, (except Fox said he'd lose by 10), and also the entire 2016 election.

2018-03-12 18:53:16 UTC  

I think this is the media just trying to energize left wing voters.

2018-03-12 18:53:37 UTC  

>yfw this poll energizes even more Saccone voters out on Tuesday

2018-03-12 18:53:50 UTC  

They told us Texas Primary would be a blow up for democrats because of muh early voting, and it wasn't.

2018-03-12 18:53:52 UTC  

Monmouth University might have an agenda

2018-03-12 18:54:20 UTC  

they said PA was Clinton+4

2018-03-12 18:54:24 UTC  

on November 1

2018-03-12 18:54:27 UTC  

lol

2018-03-12 18:54:34 UTC  

Did anyone read that article I posted? I really feel that if that analysis was correct then Lamb winning is nearly impossible. It would have to be a massive blowout

2018-03-12 18:54:48 UTC  

I'll check it

2018-03-12 18:54:59 UTC  

In class

2018-03-12 18:55:22 UTC  

Anyone check the weather for the areas *under* Pittsburgh?

2018-03-12 18:56:12 UTC  

"The Monmouth poll was conducted March 8-11 — with most of the interviews coming before Trump’s rally last Saturday night in the district. But the poll indicates Trump’s backing of Saccone may be a wash for the Republican nominee."

2018-03-12 18:56:17 UTC  

hmm

2018-03-12 18:56:38 UTC  

"“Voters are divided on the potential impact of tariffs. It doesn’t seem that the president’s gambit paid off in this race if that was his intent,” said Murray. Still, he noted that the poll was taken largely before the rally “and we don’t have a clear picture of what impact that might“ have."

2018-03-12 18:56:40 UTC  

hmmmmm

2018-03-12 18:57:23 UTC  

hmmmm

2018-03-12 18:57:31 UTC  

good find

2018-03-12 18:58:26 UTC  

"we don't have a clear picture of what impact that (the rally) might have".

2018-03-12 18:58:37 UTC  

well, that's pretty significant

2018-03-12 18:58:58 UTC  

That means if Saccone wins by 1,

2018-03-12 18:59:32 UTC  

Then Trumps rally boosted him up by 8

2018-03-12 18:59:44 UTC  

@Den @FLanon @🎃Boo-ton🎃 That rally had wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy more than 372 people

2018-03-12 19:00:01 UTC  

also, whoa

2018-03-12 19:00:04 UTC  

look

2018-03-12 19:00:14 UTC  

42% Allegheny County
24% Washington/Greene County
34% Westmoreland County

2018-03-12 19:00:22 UTC  

are those proper proportions @Den ?

2018-03-12 19:00:29 UTC  

I think 372 is a pretty small polling sample, isn't it?

2018-03-12 19:00:45 UTC  

Depends

2018-03-12 19:01:17 UTC  

depends on how accurate the sample represents the district

2018-03-12 19:02:36 UTC  

From Nate Silver "It encompasses parts of four counties: Allegheny (home to 43 percent of the district’s voters, based on 2016 presidential results), Westmoreland (33 percent), Washington (22 percent) and Greene (2 percent)."

2018-03-12 19:02:59 UTC  

hmm

2018-03-12 19:04:12 UTC  

BUT the Parts of Allegheny are very different. Like around Mount Lebanon is probably like 70% Dem and parts of Southern Allegheny are probably 70% Republican. So who knows where they took the samples

2018-03-12 19:04:40 UTC  

Fucking Union Voters though

2018-03-12 19:05:03 UTC  

We're definitely going to have to do something about RTW soon

2018-03-12 19:06:51 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/399676530394923010/422832869522669568/image.png

2018-03-12 19:07:59 UTC  

I don't know. It just seems mathematically impossible to me.

2018-03-12 19:09:05 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/399676530394923010/422833427780337664/llamfa.PNG

2018-03-12 19:09:11 UTC  

I mean the district isn't even very elastic