Message from @Nuke
Discord ID: 425014253716635649
Like OK a few blue dogs in 90% mestizo non-white Hispanic districts in Texas and crap
and in New Jersey
but the real goal is to essentially slaughter the Democrats as a whole
Force them to run Blue Dogs in states like Massachusetts, New York, etc.
And force them to allow a filibuster-proof majority of Blue Dogs + Republicans in the Senate.
Which would prevent filibuster abuse and avert a brutal law-passage rampage like Obama was able to do after he got elected.
@Nuke in what way did you make fun of Styx
No one feels ambivalent about Trump. In NBC/WSJ poll, 58% of those who approve of him, approve "strongly." Of those who disapprove, 81% "strongly" disapprove
@Deleted User Threw a fedora meme at him on Twitter of course
And yeah I've noticed that
People who are "in the middle" are like
always strongly partisan
They're basically meme radical centrists begging for attention by trying to be anti-Trump and "moderate" at the same time.
like they're really just opposing Trump "in moderation"
I think that the blue dog guys can be negotiated to our side, if we want the GOP to be a big tent party, it's only necessary.
We shouldn't seek that ending though.
No, that's not what I mean.
I mean the Blue Dogs need to be used as bargaining chips. That's their entire purpose.
Yep. Tariffs maybe we could get their support on.
Their purpose is that they're Democrats who can talk to both sides--ideologically similar to Republicans, but monetarily bound to the Democrats.
Well, we need all the seats we can get, so Trump definitely should set up a meeting with the congressional blue dog coalition and begin negotiations, this is why he was elected in the first place.
He's a dealmaker, a negotiator, and he made billions on it, he can deal with the blue dogs.
Yep.
But the important thing is the Senate
The House isn't really important right now.
The Senate is the holdup.
Yes, it is right now.
And it will be unless we can get either a filibuster-proof majority (60 votes) or we can get enough friendly Democrats to our side to accomplish cloture.
Btw which would be preferable a crappy GOP neocon candidate or a blue dog?
Neocon.
Neocon
Unless the blue dog had a massive advantage on FP
but since over 90% of Congress is BS on foreign policy that's a non-issue
Sabato's ratings are garbage.
Don't know why I've been thinking they were good.
Why do you want Blue Dogs Nuke?
Manchin is a Blue Dog and he's voted against us on everything and I think he supported the Democratic shutdown.
lol at 5% of Democrats preferring a Republican congress
haha