Message from @🎃Boo-ton🎃
Discord ID: 431841524326727709
The thing is, the number of Muslims won't be too relevant if they don't know how to be organized in terms of fighting.
If (well, when) another recession happens, I could see it easily happening some time in the 2020s.
Sweden will have a French Revolution tier event. They can't go ignoring reality for that long without building up a MAJOR backlash.
No no, I meant how far Sweden will drop in terms of first, second or third world status.
If the Muslims reach a population mass high enough to commit to civil war quickly: there won't be enough time to suck the state dry of resources via welfare. If it takes a long time: then Sweden will hit 3rd world status.
It's a race against time because every minute of every day muzzies are feeding off the Swedish welfare system as parasites.
So if the civil war happens sooner rather than later: Sweden will be far better off financially. If it takes longer the state will begin lowering the quality of services provided to citizens and eventually simple things like clean drinking water will be difficult to get a hold of.
Oh yeah, the more Muslims, the faster things will accelerate to civil war. That's one of the main tenets of 'accelerationism' but the thing is, I think that idea is more than a bit boneheaded.
(accelerationism is the idea that you should deliberately hasten decline by voting for leftist politicians and enacting extreme leftist policies to make things collapse, so that things can be restored in the ensuing civil war...but the thing is, you're not guaranteed to win)
Yeah, I'm aware of it, I am also aware of Siege, I too think it's a dumb as shit idea.
In my own video to the alt-right, I advocated for right wingers to convince centrists to support instituting just 3 key pieces of legislation in any and every western nation. And if the right could get the center to agree to just those 3 key things: it would cause the left to go from violent riots and random acts of terrorism, into open civil warfare.
Which would occur before they've managed to sink western nations to being second and third world nations: and do so before they had the necessary invasion troops on their side to actually win.
https://youtu.be/13eIJI4QeaE
The following dialogue taken from my video above.
"1, prosecute, to the fullest extent of the law, all criminal violations and mass deport all non-citizen violators of the law.
2, close your borders and restrict the number of legal immigrants to no more than 1% of the population proper. With a priority list which includes factors like education level, conversational level fluency in the Native language, skilled trades, etc.
3, Restrict the Welfare State to citizens and restrict it's benefits the way unemployment is restricted by measured increment of tax revenues put into the system in the way your unemployment is measured by the volume of money put into that.
-No welfare benefits for illegals.
-No welfare benefits for migrants who are not citizens.
-No multi-generational parasitism of welfare benefits. "
You have a YouTube channel ? Interesting.
I posted one of my videos in the customs channel when providing an example of opposition research with which to hang democrats in the upcoming midterms in Pennsylvania and Michigan.
do you want me to repost that here so you can see the example I'm talking about?
yeah, I'll watch this one later
You don't have to watch the hole thing - that particular link goes directly to the section of the video where I discuss the topic. Democrats in Pennsylvania and Michigan were virtue signalling by making a public spectacle out of writing a law to make female genital mutilation illegal in both of those states. Meanwhile - in reality land FGM is already illegal at the federal level and has been since 1996, and in the video I point out the exact law. So they were rallying public support to write a law to make something illegal, which is already illegal, and it was nothing but a cynical, manipulative, repugnant act of deception - a photo-op/publicity stunt.
Interesting, that's smart of them.
Not terribly, it only works because liberals are typical brain dead and respond to emotional rhetoric. If the Republicans in those states expose the fact that this was a grand shit show the democrats were putting on - they'd be exposed for the psychopathic pack of liars and fiends that they are.
The new roles remind me that I need to get to work on my images.
@Nuke is there anything else I can tag you with
Tag me with whatever you want, data/GD would fit.
COOK POLITICAL SHIFTS MORE DISTRICTS TO THE LEFT
@Deleted User @FLanon ITS OVER
Yeah, it's a bad situation with the chaos
NV-03 is no longer considered a tossup
bad news
There's a lot that can change from now and November though
The Rs should get on a message for anyone (myself included) to care about voting for them.
@🎃Boo-ton🎃 it looks like they're changing more districts to the right as well
Full List of Changes:
CA-21: Valadao (R)
Likely R to Lean R
IA-02: Loebsack (D)
Likely D to Solid D
NV-03: OPEN (Rosen) (D)
Toss Up to Lean D
NV-04: OPEN (Kihuen) (D)
Lean D to Likely D
NJ-03: Tom MacArthur (R)
Likely R to Lean R
NJ-05: Josh Gottheimer (D)
Lean D to Likely D
NY-18: Sean Patrick Maloney (D)
Likely D to Solid D
NC-09: Robert Pittenger (R)
Likely R to Lean R
OH-10: Mike Turner (R)
Solid R to Likely R
WA-03: Jaime Herrera Beutler (R)
Solid R to Likely R
WA-05: Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R)
Likely R to Lean R
WI-07: Sean Duffy (R)
Solid R to Likely R
WV-03: OPEN (Jenkins) (R)
Solid R to Likely R
hmm
I'll probably still my incumbent, but the problem with the GOP is they are disjointed and doing nothing
They are being indecisive, flip-flopping, they need to run on a solid and consistent narrative.
"This enthusiasm gap has been on display in off-year and special elections all cycle, including last month in Pennsylvania's 18th CD, where Democrat Conor Lamb won a district Trump had carried by over 19 points."
"Retirements are also aiding House Democrats' path to a majority."
The Democrats definitely have a message. Medicare for All, and Impeach Trump.
Indeed.
We don't like those messages, but at least they exist
@FLanon <@&414473406264639488> "Republicans desperately need to catch some breaks to offset the new Pennsylvania map. One way they could negate those gains would be to "shut out" Democrats in one or several top-two primaries on June 5 in California. There's a slight chance crowded fields of Democrats in the 39th, 48th and 49th CDs could allow two GOP candidates to advance to the November general election, removing otherwise highly vulnerable GOP seats from the playing field entirely."
There is a reason for someone to vote for democrats, Republicans aren't delivering