If I were a Swede - I'd gtfo of Swedistan, set up a government in exile in Switzerland.

@Deleted User -shrug- Democracy is the road by which the majority oppresses the minority. Sweden is filled to the brim with leftists who will endlessly roll over and allow their women and children to be raped, their culture subverted, their streets defiled, their men to chained and will excuse any action committed by a Jihadi simply because of the Marxist ideology that all human beings are identical and interchangeable - therefore by their rationale: they must hide any evidence to the contrary and o to any lengths to ignore the reality in front of their faces.

Since Sweden's a democracy and not a Representational Constitutional Republic: the leftists / progressives / liberals will maintain their ideological purity to the bitter end. The best possible scenario to play out would be for the rational minded Swedes to seek refuge elsewhere until the Muslims reach critical mass. By that I mean they reach numbers which would enable them to commit to open civil war: at which point the rational Swedes who got out can go back in having been armed by one of the freer states of Europe like Switzerland, Poland or the Czech Republic, and retake Sweden from the Muslim invaders.

if you think I'm wrong - show me where I have failed to logically determine the likely course of events.

-shrug-

*"If I were a Swede - I'd gtfo of Swedistan, set up a government in exile in Switzerland."*

Depends on how quickly the Muslims infest it and at what volume. The longer it takes - the lower Sweden's standard of living will get as a direct result of the Muslim drain on resources via the welfare state. If it happens faster: then most of the infrastructure will remain intact.

No no, I meant how far Sweden will drop in terms of first, second or third world status.

If the Muslims reach a population mass high enough to commit to civil war quickly: there won't be enough time to suck the state dry of resources via welfare. If it takes a long time: then Sweden will hit 3rd world status.

It's a race against time because every minute of every day muzzies are feeding off the Swedish welfare system as parasites.

So if the civil war happens sooner rather than later: Sweden will be far better off financially. If it takes longer the state will begin lowering the quality of services provided to citizens and eventually simple things like clean drinking water will be difficult to get a hold of.

Yeah, I'm aware of it, I am also aware of Siege, I too think it's a dumb as shit idea.

In my own video to the alt-right, I advocated for right wingers to convince centrists to support instituting just 3 key pieces of legislation in any and every western nation. And if the right could get the center to agree to just those 3 key things: it would cause the left to go from violent riots and random acts of terrorism, into open civil warfare.

Which would occur before they've managed to sink western nations to being second and third world nations: and do so before they had the necessary invasion troops on their side to actually win.

https://youtu.be/13eIJI4QeaE

The following dialogue taken from my video above.
"1, prosecute, to the fullest extent of the law, all criminal violations and mass deport all non-citizen violators of the law.

2, close your borders and restrict the number of legal immigrants to no more than 1% of the population proper. With a priority list which includes factors like education level, conversational level fluency in the Native language, skilled trades, etc.

3, Restrict the Welfare State to citizens and restrict it's benefits the way unemployment is restricted by measured increment of tax revenues put into the system in the way your unemployment is measured by the volume of money put into that.

-No welfare benefits for illegals.
-No welfare benefits for migrants who are not citizens.
-No multi-generational parasitism of welfare benefits. "

I posted one of my videos in the customs channel when providing an example of opposition research with which to hang democrats in the upcoming midterms in Pennsylvania and Michigan.

do you want me to repost that here so you can see the example I'm talking about?

You don't have to watch the hole thing - that particular link goes directly to the section of the video where I discuss the topic. Democrats in Pennsylvania and Michigan were virtue signalling by making a public spectacle out of writing a law to make female genital mutilation illegal in both of those states. Meanwhile - in reality land FGM is already illegal at the federal level and has been since 1996, and in the video I point out the exact law. So they were rallying public support to write a law to make something illegal, which is already illegal, and it was nothing but a cynical, manipulative, repugnant act of deception - a photo-op/publicity stunt.

Not terribly, it only works because liberals are typical brain dead and respond to emotional rhetoric. If the Republicans in those states expose the fact that this was a grand shit show the democrats were putting on - they'd be exposed for the psychopathic pack of liars and fiends that they are.

Best one of my life time. Also - most entertaining election cycle of my life time.

The liberals have been shitting in the street, shot one of their own, got called out for criticizing a "nazi haircut" of a guy who's hair was like that due to terminal late stage brain cancer, stripped naked to flash the president in protest, stripped naked and screamed to show discontent, and held public events where they screamed at the sky

Most - Entertainment per Hour - in my lifetime.

the news used to be boring - now it's like a jack in the box. Every news broadcast I'm hanging on the edge of my seat for the next example of liberals acting batshit insane.

https://youtu.be/vy1V5LHXWbg

@Deleted User This was one of the libshits little events where they stripped naked and screamed as a protest.

easiest meme I ever wrote.

It's easy to get black pilled in a nihilistic culture, especially when there doesn't appear to be any way to turn the tide of battle.

@shrub

I was responding to an earlier comment by red in this channel.

"*Red Storm (NYC;Founder) - Today at 7:45 AM
@Observing Libertarian ahahahahahahahaa
@[Lex] there's a difference between describing the conditions of something, and having a whiny defeatist attitude towards it*

Message has been removed.

OOOooooohhhh, sorry. I misunderstood. I thought you were talking about my comments made here.

?

Oh, ok ok I gotcha,

I took a 3 hour nap last night somewhere between 7 and 10. Before that I don't recall when I last slept. If today's Sunday, and I had a nap last night, I'm sure I slept sometime Thursday.

Trump's message -was- "America First", but then he went neocon for Israel.

Trump is 90% rhetoric to keep people from knowing what he's actually going to do. And ultimately: what he usually does is kick legislative decisions down to the legislators. Trump can't ban bump stocks: he quite literally does not have the authority to do so. The legislature would have to write a bill declaring bump stocks illegal, pass the house and senate, get to his desk and then he could sign it.

-claps hands- Children - oh children

There is no 4d chess: anything Trump doesn't want to do, like make a decision on DACA he just hands it off to the legislature because it take congress 1-3 years to write, vote, committee, revise, argue over terms, vote again: then repeat the whole process when it clears the house and enters the senate.

What did he do about DACA? He handed it to the legislature and gave the democrats all kinds of other issues to go batshit insane over. What was the result? The time limitations on DACA ran out, it has not been renewed, DACA is now dead and he even got to blame it on the democrats.

It's not 4d chess: it's fucking simple shit.

This incessant whining is tiresome. Vote for someone else next election.

@FLanon - DACA - is - dead. It's done. It's time limitation ended without being renewed.

Yes @FLanon , as you have stated, do I need to count how many times in the last 5 minutes. Message - got it.

What, particular, policy, do you not like - @🎃Boo-ton🎃 ?

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 , have bump stocks been banned?

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 according to the ATF - they do not have legal authority to ban bump stocks. So it doesn't matter what letter gets sent to the DOJ.

unless congress amends the NFA to include bump stocks as being prohibited - then bump stocks can't legally be banned.

This is what happens when women's menstrual cycles synchronize.

We can tell - go jerk off or something.

If Trump gives the democrats 12 things to complain about: they can't rally massive support to block the 1 thing he wants to actually accomplish.

Anything says - means absolutely nothing, Anything he attempts to actually do: that's what matters.

If he kicks it off to someone else to handle - it means he's pretending to give a fuck.

If he pretends to give a fuck about topic Q
It gives democrats something to attack

that way he can focus on accomplishing topic P

That's why we have a new tax rate -

Unemployment rate for WWC: historic lows.
Income tax on WWC - historic lows.
manufacturing businesses - returning to the states.

coal industry - back in business

heroin? I thought the popular drug these days was meth?

ah, ok. So opioids in general, gotcha

Unfortunately Sessions is about as useful as a second asshole.

If the Rule of Law were enforced: the problem of immigration wouldn't be a problem.

Incessant whining about what you haven't gotten -yet- is inherently childish.
I used to get paid $10 an hour to babysit and listen to hyperactive children.

It's like watching a 5 year old throwing a tantrum in a store pounding it's fists on the ground "i want! i want! i want! i want! "

If you "trusted" someone running for political office - blame yourself and no one else.

You "trust" people in political office?
Really?

How old are you?