Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 435822917478121472


2018-04-17 10:14:35 UTC  

Umm

2018-04-17 10:28:52 UTC  

Wait I just read the article, it doesn't seem too significant, the US controls the gas and oil fields whoopty do, big deal. Syria is still allowed to use them

2018-04-17 10:32:29 UTC  

Hi everyone

2018-04-17 10:34:51 UTC  

Hi

2018-04-17 12:47:03 UTC  

>yfw
>yfw
>yfw
>yfw
>yfw
>yfw
>yfw
>yfw
>yfw

2018-04-17 13:13:42 UTC  

@Deleted User fancy seeing you here

2018-04-17 13:21:16 UTC  

Holy crap those optics.

2018-04-17 13:51:32 UTC  

*rubs hands*

2018-04-17 13:52:01 UTC  

This is the best possible thing that could happen for Trump's PR.

2018-04-17 13:57:59 UTC  

Why do people still believes the lies about the tax cut?

2018-04-17 13:59:51 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/399676530394923010/435801571864084500/image.png

2018-04-17 14:50:36 UTC  

@FLanon These are too many retirements...No way Democrats don't take the House...

2018-04-17 14:51:15 UTC  
2018-04-17 15:00:16 UTC  

**WTF**

2018-04-17 15:00:36 UTC  

**SUPREME COURT RESTRICTS DEPORTATION OF CRIMINAL ALIENS**

2018-04-17 15:01:13 UTC  

**Supreme Court invalidates part of federal law requiring mandatory deportation of immigrants convicted of some crimes. For first time, Justice Neil Gorsuch joins with more liberal Justices to produce 5-4 majority!!!**

2018-04-17 15:02:03 UTC  

@FLanon **THIS IS A DISASTER AREA**

2018-04-17 15:18:19 UTC  

@FLanon Don't forget reunification.

2018-04-17 15:24:40 UTC  

is this going to be yet another non-problem like the unarmed National Guard thing

2018-04-17 15:26:03 UTC  

Depends on what you call a "non-problem"

2018-04-17 15:27:19 UTC  

It isn't really a bad ruling legally

2018-04-17 15:28:24 UTC  

ARE YOU KIDDING

2018-04-17 15:28:32 UTC  

But it's a bad ruling for us

2018-04-17 15:45:27 UTC  

>The Supreme Court just handed the Trump administration a loss on immigration โ€” and Gorsuch was the tiebreaking vote
>The case the high court ruled in involves James Dimaya, a native of the Philippines who came to the United States legally as a 13-year-old in 1992. After he pleaded no contest to two charges of burglary in California, the government began deportation proceedings against him. The government argued among other things that he could be removed from the country because his convictions qualified as crimes of violence that allowed his removal under immigration law.

>The case was initially argued in January of 2017 by a court that was short a member because the late Justice Antonin Scalia's seat had not yet been filled. An eight member court didn't decide the issue, presumably because the justices were deadlocked 4-4. After Justice Neil Gorsuch joined the court, the justices heard the case re-argued. Gorsuch joined the court's more liberal justices in finding the clause too vague.

>The case is Sessions v. Dimaya, 15-1498.

2018-04-17 15:45:34 UTC  

lol a fellow flip

2018-04-17 15:46:55 UTC  

so apparently he isn't being deported because the charge is merely burglary

2018-04-17 15:47:22 UTC  

probably one of those wannabe black guys

2018-04-17 15:50:17 UTC  

@Deleted User what happened to Cake Master Shop vs Colorado Civil Rights Commission?

2018-04-17 15:50:31 UTC  

Did I miss the ruling or are they still talking?

2018-04-17 15:51:02 UTC  

dunno

2018-04-17 15:51:09 UTC  

Cake Master Shop ?

2018-04-17 15:51:16 UTC  

The one guy

2018-04-17 15:51:28 UTC  

Was like Piece Master Cake shopcor something

2018-04-17 15:51:39 UTC  

The one with the gays demanding you to give them shot

2018-04-17 15:51:41 UTC  

Shit*

2018-04-17 15:51:51 UTC  

Masterpiece Cake Shop

2018-04-17 15:51:56 UTC  

vs Colorado CRC

2018-04-17 15:52:16 UTC  

The ruling isn't out yet.

2018-04-17 15:52:28 UTC  

But that's the really important one, and Gorsuch looks like he's reliable there.