Message from @🎃Boo-ton🎃
Discord ID: 439950199566368792
>No mention of a wall
I'll call a lot of bullshit on the "I've accomplished more than I promised" though
He talked about the wall earlier
What did he say
tfw missed most of the stream
That they're building some of it in San Diego or something
What a damn liar
He'd better have a good plan for that thing, and have the whole thing funded
That's a dirty trick to pull on your supporters, Mr. President
Like I've said, next budget.
That's not a wall and he *knows* it
It's an exaggeration, yeah.
rally for Trump
He exaggerates for a living, have you seen him talk?
You're never getting s wall BM
@🎃Boo-ton🎃 immigration is important, but it's not the only issue, and he doesn't have the votes right now for the wall
stop your bitching
There is no feasible way that gets through the Senate
He's done that for decades and when he was in real estate
It's not like your vote matters in the presidential election lol
You're from CA bud
Two can play at this "muh principles" game
In his district it does count
Not in the presidential election
In his house election yeah, but hold that to his rep
@🎃Boo-ton🎃#752 He said that there's another budget in September and that he would veto it if it doesn't include funding for the wall
@🎃Boo-ton🎃 your congressman is pretty great though, right ?
>Washington, MI
why the hell would you punish your local congressman if it's not his fault
Man I wish George Washington weren't associated to Washington and Washington.
If he wants to take down trump by taking down his Representative you're basically just shooting yourself in the foot
@Walter Johnson Why would he? If he didn't veto the first bill, why would he do the next time?
Under a new financial year where he can invoke a simple majority vote for appropriations, he could have the wall in the budget
Because of the rule
@🎃Boo-ton🎃 well he explicitly said he wasn't doing this again.
You can only do it once per FY
The only reason I'm forgiving Scalise for the Omnibus is honestly because he's the Whip.
He needed 60 votes for the budget, because he invoked it on the tax cuts already
On the next one, he can invoke the rule again, and then he only needs Rs, maybe by a tight margin, but he can still do it.