Message from @Nuke
Discord ID: 440327090047287296
He would have won if he tried harder
It was razor thin
Nah, people were just successfully suppressed
Debate, do anything other than watch football
The DNC worked their magic.
It was close enough
Brandenburg v. Ohio wasn't as big of a deal as Brown v. Board.
Schenck totally was
He easily could've won but he tortoise and the hare'd it and he was the hare.
That was the first case establishing limitations on the 1st amendment
Precedent is meaningless unless honestly.
52% of Trump voters in Alabama didn't show up
Look at Earl Warren's court.
that's how he lost
Come on, it was winnable
Easily winnable.
He didn't try hard enough.
Maybe, but it would've given Democrats great ammo for the midterms.
"phedo sympathizers"
Roe v. Wade was a 7-2 decision for instance.
@Nuke Heller Vs DC was 5-4
Litteraly one more Democrat and the 2nd amendment would be gone.
Just like that.
Heller v. DC did not overturn anything. There's a tendency for the SCOTUS to not overrule, but instead weaken, and SCOTUS usually only weakens them really.
A great example is Lochner, which is still an active decision, but they've declawed it so much that it's effectively overturned.
Heller vs DC would have overturned it if the liberal side of the court had a majority is my point.
even though precedent was set, it is basically meaningless.
HELLER V. DC WOULD NEVER HAVE OVERTURNED ANYTHING
>win 29% of the White Vote
>still win
Jones is the luckiest politician alive, honestly
The Second Amendment as we know it today was basically established in the 21st century.
It was regarded as only applying to the federal govt until the 20th century and then no one really violated it until the 21st century when SCOTUS had to issue a ruling.
He got an insane percent with the blacks
Like 97% or something right?
Virtually 100%
yes
what individuals right
natural conservatives
Furthermore, justices tend to not want to overturn things, as I said. The decisions you just cited had precedent at very least, as SCOTUS did not even rule that the First Amendment applied to states _at all_ until later on.