Message from @FLanon
Discord ID: 440326787252355072
He should've ran more on immigration
But isn't it amazing,
nah he never would've won.
He should've held back the comments about slavery
The allegations were too damaging.
Would've damaged the GOP as a whole.
He had a great chance of winning
White Alabama voted for Moore by +39 points @zakattack04 @zakattack04
Until the allegations arose.
yeah BM but
No one wanted to vote for him after the sexual stuff.
He would have won if he tried harder
It was razor thin
Nah, people were just successfully suppressed
Debate, do anything other than watch football
The DNC worked their magic.
It was close enough
Brandenburg v. Ohio wasn't as big of a deal as Brown v. Board.
Schenck totally was
That was the first case establishing limitations on the 1st amendment
Precedent is meaningless unless honestly.
52% of Trump voters in Alabama didn't show up
Look at Earl Warren's court.
that's how he lost
Come on, it was winnable
Easily winnable.
He didn't try hard enough.
Maybe, but it would've given Democrats great ammo for the midterms.
"phedo sympathizers"
The fact is you need a big majority for that sort of thing.
Roe v. Wade was a 7-2 decision for instance.
@Nuke Heller Vs DC was 5-4
Litteraly one more Democrat and the 2nd amendment would be gone.
Just like that.
Heller v. DC did not overturn anything. There's a tendency for the SCOTUS to not overrule, but instead weaken, and SCOTUS usually only weakens them really.
A great example is Lochner, which is still an active decision, but they've declawed it so much that it's effectively overturned.
Heller vs DC would have overturned it if the liberal side of the court had a majority is my point.
even though precedent was set, it is basically meaningless.
HELLER V. DC WOULD NEVER HAVE OVERTURNED ANYTHING