Message from @zakattack04
Discord ID: 441412546507833344
easily yes, 4% more
Obama's brainless negro bloc was lock-on by default
LMAO
Quora is really cucked
from that same link
Duh
this answer is dated November 4, 2016
"And while itās not part of your question, in 2016, I personally expect Mr. Trump to get fewer than 60 million votes. I assume Sec. Clinton wants to get more than the 69.5 million votes than Mr. Obama got in 2008, and I will be watching to see if she gets > 70 million votes."
well that's just silly
November 7, 2017
"Yes.
The narrative this election cycle has operated on a false equivalency narrative. Clintonās e-mails are somehow the same as Donald Trumpās history of sexual assault. The Clinton foundation is a slush fund in the same way as Donald Trumpās charitable organizations are slush funds. This is the last ārealā election because it will likely be the last election where white people make up the majority of voters. Itās pure insanity.
Letās talk about facts. The Clinton campaign relies on things like data and analytics to guide them while Donald Trump uses his Twitter feed. Oneās a pro the other is a wannabe. The truth is that this would not be a close election were it not for the utterly ridiculous āre-investigationā of Clintonās e-mail server. Clinton has had a healthy lead throughout this race. Take a look at the polling from 538:"
"But, seriously, I donāt know any pollster who thinks either Michigan, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Colorado or New Mexico are going to Trump. Those are going to be in the Democratic column. And in the same breath I donāt know anyone who thinks thereās a scenario where Hillary wins Georgia, Iowa, Arizona or Maine. To me, it seems unlikely that Hillary will win Ohio as well, but because Virginia and Nevada are likely to go her way that doesnāt matter. Hereās where the race actually is if you call the race as the polls tell you to call it."
good old nostalgia
"Trumpās only chance in this election was to turn some blue states red and if he wins Ohio, which he could, then he will have done more than I thought he could, but it still wonāt be enough to win the election. Building a firewall is how you win elections. Thatās what worked for Obama in ā08 and ā12 and itās what will work yet again for Clinton in 2016. You can argue that the polls are wrong (which Trump supporters like to do) or simply shout: āthe election is rigged.ā Neither of these things changes the facts however, which is ironic because it is the facts that Mr. Trump has been so averse to acknowledging that have been the real story of this election. You couldnāt fact check a Trump stump speech because so little of what he said was actually true. This was, in many ways, the post-truth election."
"Now, these models are based on a conservative prediction of how the election could go. Clinton could have a much better night than anticipated by any of the forecasters and that would make sense since so many pollsters are playing it very close to the vest after repeatedly counting Mr. Trump out during the primary season. The reality is this however: Latinos are very motivated this election season and that is very good news for Hillary Clinton. What weāre seeing from early voting is that turnout is going to be strong among minorities and if thatās the case on Election Day weāll be looking at a much different electoral map on Election Night; one where frankly we may not need to wait until 11pm EDT for the election to be called."
Yeah I'm just going to go to work on what we have ahead
Funny how these people counted on the hispanic vote when Trump ended up overperforming with them compared to both Romney and McCain
let me dump the rest in <#409511459844784138>
>If she does these 11 things, she definetly can.
CUCKED
As trump said
But Romney didn't fight back."
@Nuke you're a pretty good analyst. What do you think Romney should have done to beat Obama
It's obvious
Win over White People by appealing to the anger and frustrations of Whites due to a changing cultural landscape
Like Trump did
@šBoo-tonš that strategy won't work in 10 years
Based former Obama staffer
Nelson's 2012 performance compared to Scott's 2014 performance
Scott wasn't very popular in 2014.
The only real reason he has a chance of winning is because he handled Hurricane Irma (?) amazingly well.
That placed him as a popular figure.
in 2012, Nelson was helped by Obama being at the top of the ballot
hell, Nelson got 300,000 more votes than Obama
so pretty much all the people who voted for Obama, were willing to vote for him
which makes sense
who else wuld they vote for? The Green Party candidate ?
there wasn't even a Green Party candidate