Message from @FLanon

Discord ID: 460260703941558273


2018-06-24 01:39:26 UTC  

Congress was Democratic

2018-06-24 01:39:29 UTC  

at that time

2018-06-24 01:39:44 UTC  

Jesus look at what happened in real life

2018-06-24 01:39:48 UTC  

so if Nixon, Wallace, and McGovern did NOT get the majority...maybe they would have given it to...McGovern?

2018-06-24 01:40:01 UTC  

Probably not someone that radical

2018-06-24 01:40:33 UTC  

I can imagine them giving it to Hubert Humphrey or something or Ted Kennedy

2018-06-24 01:42:23 UTC  

well, they'd have to choose between the Top 3 Electoral College performers

2018-06-24 01:42:32 UTC  

"If no candidate receives a majority of Electoral votes, the House of Representatives elects the President from the 3 Presidential candidates who received the most Electoral votes. Each state delegation has one vote. The Senate would elect the Vice President from the 2 Vice Presidential candidates with the most Electoral votes. Each Senator would cast one vote for Vice President. If the House of Representatives fails to elect a President by Inauguration Day, the Vice-President Elect serves as acting President until the deadlock is resolved in the House."

2018-06-24 01:43:37 UTC  

ok, so I think the map would look like this

2018-06-24 01:47:52 UTC  

Wallace would have been a good candidate, if he could win, idk about that one

2018-06-24 01:47:52 UTC  

assuming that everything else about 1972 remained the same, with people generally satisfied with Nixon

2018-06-24 01:48:32 UTC  

I'll make a map of my own, with Wallace marked in yellow and McGovern marked in blue

2018-06-24 01:48:33 UTC  

🆙 | **FLanon leveled up!**

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/399676530394923010/460259907493429248/levelup.png

2018-06-24 01:50:33 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/399676530394923010/460260410315112488/Screenshot_2018-06-23_21.50.25.png

2018-06-24 01:51:02 UTC  

assuming Wallace does quite well, and splits the white working class vote with Nixon in some states, resulting in McGovern winning them

2018-06-24 01:51:20 UTC  

I'm basing it off of the fact that the "close states" were these

2018-06-24 01:51:20 UTC  

Hi basing it off of the fact that the "close states" were these, I'm Dad!

2018-06-24 01:51:32 UTC  

I think you could see that effect play out in Oregon too

2018-06-24 01:51:41 UTC  

Minnesota, 5.51%
Rhode Island, 6.19%
South Dakota, 8.63%
Massachusetts, 8.97%
Wisconsin, 9.67%

2018-06-24 01:51:43 UTC  

I also think Wallace would win more states

2018-06-24 01:51:52 UTC  

more states where ?

2018-06-24 01:51:59 UTC  

well FL for one

2018-06-24 01:52:04 UTC  

the thing is, many Wallace fans might be fine with Nixon

2018-06-24 01:52:06 UTC  

that's the thing

2018-06-24 01:52:34 UTC  

hard to say because we don't know the circumstances and all

2018-06-24 01:53:55 UTC  

By the way, this map will be made to be a sort of "Wallace path to victory" one if possible

2018-06-24 01:54:28 UTC  

Basically to win, he'd have to take Dixie as well as the rust belt.

2018-06-24 01:56:49 UTC  

yeah, well a Watergate tier scandal would have to happen to Nixon earlier in that case

2018-06-24 01:57:47 UTC  

Well, let's say that Wallace runs a populist campaign and a committee uncovers links to the wiretap earlier, and Wallace uses it in a similar way Trump used the Hillary email scandal in 2016.

2018-06-24 02:05:57 UTC  

keep in mind that's the 2012/2016 map

2018-06-24 02:06:00 UTC  

not the 1972 map

2018-06-24 02:06:07 UTC  

Alright I'll redo it

2018-06-24 02:06:13 UTC  

use this

2018-06-24 02:06:41 UTC  

>CA at 45
>NY at 41

>TX only at 26 and FL only at 17

2018-06-24 02:07:09 UTC  

yeah

2018-06-24 02:07:13 UTC  

crazy times

2018-06-24 02:07:26 UTC  

funny how demographics change things isn't it

2018-06-24 02:32:47 UTC  

How's everyone

2018-06-24 02:33:17 UTC  

fine, right now I'm writing up a storm