Message from @Amsel
Discord ID: 484033068785598494
Mhm
It was an anti Trump Jew
Seriously, fuck lets talk elections
"will be addressed!"
Hopefully this means an EO is getting ready, there is no way that tweets will suffice for this issue
They've taken down fucking Jim
Excellent.
Who's Jim?
Metokur
<@&457366318073774082> Give me a map of Trump vs George Wallace
@Earl of Morrrrgantown Every Wallace state voted for Trump AFAIK.
He only won in a restircted area of the Deep South and served as a spoiler to stop Democrats from winning elsewhere.
Metokur came back, didn't he
@Nuke A Transexual furry pedophile vs Donald Trump
wtf
@Nuke Just give me the map
Heres mine
no way Trump is losing if his opponent is fucking dead
"no way Trump is losing if his opponent is fucking dead"
you're referring to the hypothetical George Wallace matchup?
anyway, when it comes to a hypothetical Donald Trump vs George Wallace matchup, one would need to specify a few things
Is it in 2016 where Trump is the Republican and Wallace is the (dead) Democrat? Presumably not.
Is it in 1968 when Trump was only 22? Presumably not.
Is it in 2016 where Trump is the Republican and someone with the same personality traits and political background that George Wallace had, somehow becomes the Democratic nominee? That would be really implausible. After all, a third party candidate would probably do better than Wallace in that scenario.
However, let's just say that there are only two choices on the ballot. Trump and Wallace. If staying home is an option, then most of the 62 million Trump voters would show up to vote for Trump and only a small minority would prefer Wallace, making Trump win all 50 states + DC. The vast majority of Hillary voters, Johnson voters, and Stein voters would stay home.
If staying home is not an option, there might presumably be some really low info voters who go "hurr fuck Trump let me vote for whoever has the D next to their name" but I don't think that would flip any state...even Alabama or Mississippi.
now, if this hypothetical is in 1968, that would be another story
btw @Earl of Morrrrgantown you seem to have this perception that California and New York are more liberal than Vermont and Massachusetts
I'd say that isn't the case because there are large swaths of red enclaves in California and New York, and they're mostly blue because of high minority populations, many of whom have socially conservative beliefs but vote Democratic due to social programs
whereas Vermont and Massachusetts are blue because they have an abundance of white liberals
IIRC Vermont and Massachusetts are the only states that would still be blue if only white males could vote
Vermont is the only state that would be blue if only gun owners could vote
Thoughts?
Was that written postmortem or did McCain know that he was gonna do and wrote it like a will?
"We have helped liberate more people from tyranny and poverty than ever before in history"
"We are a nation of ideals, not blood and soil"
Burn in hell
^
Ideals, Blood, and Soil
Absolute pussy
this is why I've been insisting that just because Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a socialist/Berniecrat, that doesn't mean she's more likely to lose. If anything, she'll be an even stronger opponent than Crowley
It's all about mindset, really