Message from @Julien Blanc

Discord ID: 487798269473456128


2018-09-08 01:33:15 UTC  

But there is no pro-GOP swing any way you look at it.

2018-09-08 01:33:24 UTC  

Yes exactly

2018-09-08 01:33:41 UTC  

This isn't POSITIVE that a man who won by 30% in 2014 is in a tossup scenario.

2018-09-08 01:33:42 UTC  

Just because the dems are trying harder this year doesn't mean you can just jew out and use presidential numbers

2018-09-08 01:33:55 UTC  

I don't agree that there's a pro-GOP swing

2018-09-08 01:33:56 UTC  

but

2018-09-08 01:34:02 UTC  

@whoisjohngalt brought up valid points

2018-09-08 01:34:07 UTC  

no reason to bash him so harshly

2018-09-08 01:34:13 UTC  

He started it...

2018-09-08 01:34:23 UTC  

He literally began condescending to FLAnon.

2018-09-08 01:34:25 UTC  

Scroll up.

2018-09-08 01:34:30 UTC  

Scold him before you scold these folks.

2018-09-08 01:34:37 UTC  

I wasn't even involved in the convo and I scrolled up.

2018-09-08 01:34:51 UTC  

And saw him act like a complete retard unnecessarily.

2018-09-08 01:34:51 UTC  

check this out btw

2018-09-08 01:35:40 UTC  

Wow that is bad

2018-09-08 01:35:54 UTC  

Worrisome but not necessarily reflective of the upcomign results.

2018-09-08 01:36:00 UTC  

@FLanon sample is still small

2018-09-08 01:36:08 UTC  

plus

2018-09-08 01:36:10 UTC  

undecideds

2018-09-08 01:36:21 UTC  

MN-01 was R +14 in a recent poll.

2018-09-08 01:36:27 UTC  

so pinch of salt

2018-09-08 01:36:36 UTC  

This is MN-08

2018-09-08 01:36:47 UTC  

I know.

2018-09-08 01:36:55 UTC  

But it's just an example of an outrageous poll recently in Minnesota.

2018-09-08 01:37:00 UTC  

MN-01 is a pure toss up.

2018-09-08 01:37:12 UTC  

I suppose we'll see

2018-09-08 01:37:25 UTC  

@FLanon read beyond the headline numbers

2018-09-08 01:37:27 UTC  

I think our resources in flipping districts will be well spent in NH

2018-09-08 01:37:40 UTC  

Given how erratic the polls have been, we'll have to wait until they stabilise.

2018-09-08 01:37:44 UTC  

"It’s still early, though. Each candidate’s total could easily be seven points different if we polled everyone in the district. And having a small sample is only one possible source of error."

2018-09-08 01:37:47 UTC  

If they don't, we'll just have to wait until the day of the election.

2018-09-08 01:37:58 UTC  

"The margin of sampling error on the overall lead is 12 points, roughly twice as large as the margin for a single candidate’s vote share. One reason we’re doing these surveys live is so you can see the uncertainty for yourself."

2018-09-08 01:38:16 UTC  

"About 15 percent of voters said that they were undecided or refused to tell us whom they would vote for.

If they were to break 4 to 1 in favor of Republicans, that alone would be enough to change the lead in our poll, assuming we did everything else perfectly. (We could also be wrong on turnout or our sample could be unrepresentative. Or other voters could change their minds.)"

2018-09-08 01:38:22 UTC  

These tossups are EXTREMELY close.

2018-09-08 01:38:31 UTC  

This is one of the closest midterms in history.

2018-09-08 01:38:32 UTC  

we'd rather it be a Stauber lead, but...

2018-09-08 01:39:18 UTC  

We need to get that turnout drive on the road sooner rather than later if we want to claim we had a strongly positive effect this election.

2018-09-08 01:39:28 UTC  

And this is why I don’t care for polls

2018-09-08 01:39:49 UTC  

Ah, yes, he is summoned.