4 out of 100

so the following test had me sat in a box 5m by 5m by 5m and i had set up a point where CO2 would be filtered in by a combustion reaction in an open system separate of the box. i was in there for 30 minutes doing the following: solving equations, solving simultaneous equations and factorisation. i timed how long each question took each one was as difficult as the one before. during this time measurements of CO2 were taken by how much was entering the box per minute and by 0.07% i had noticed about 5 seconds increase in time taken to solve the problems on average. by 0.1% it had increased by at least 10 seconds and my mind was beginning to feel foggy and i lethargic. i continued to .15% at which point i had to leave as i was on the verge of passing out

i fully well understand the difference between 0.04 and 1

The earth isnt 5m by 5m

no but the proportion of concentration means that it doesn't matter

Show me the experiment and accompanying data

i don't think u understand what proportional means

I think you have your numbers wrong

i don't have it with me rn

i don't think i do

Then you are just blowing smoke

Climate change is a hoax

The ice caps are not melting

i think the book might be in my attic and i don't have the key, my room mate does. he won't be home for another couple of hours

They will never melt

The sun doesnt get close enough to the ice to melt it.

ok now ur just not understanding physics

they're waves of radiation not sound waves

Did you read the article i posted or not?

i read enough of it to figure out what kind of garbage i was reading yes

Its nothing to do with physica

i think that the sun's radiation not being strong enough to melt ice caps is *very* much physics

K you are indoctrinated

Was co2 many times higher in the past and did life thrive?

K you are boring to talk to. You have a belief system because you have been indoctrinated by liberal politicians who have paid for fake climate science by agencies like nasa

Gtg bye

so me doing research independent of anyone else's interests because i was curious as to see if it was actually true about climate change is indoctrination? CO2 has been high in the past while complex life has existed but they didn't need to use cognitive functions like we do now. they used cognitive functions to hunt and seek shelter from rains etc. which i personally wouldn't call complex thought

wouldn’t you say that your belief system is also biased since you don’t seem open to hearing what koro was saying

so again just going back to indoctrination when i did this research to see if what they were saying is true or not and found that if anything that it was under played by the media

Show the data

again i think it's in the attic as it's not in my office space and i don't have a key

Co2 is .04%. We can handle 1% without any detectable limitations

Disprove me.

You are lying. @Koro

I dont believe you.

@mysweettart ive heard what these fear mongers say. We are all going to die in 12 years.

Its a scam

To steal money through taxes

Show the data and experiment

so again i'll refer back to what i said about the cognitive inhibitions that i suffered trying to do what is to me fairly basic maths and the time it was taking me increasing instead of decreasing like you would expect as someone becomes more practised in doing those questions

Your numbers are wrong