Lets see it

idk the exact numbers but i've got a book somewhere that i recorded the stuff into

K well you dont know what you are talking about

We are well be the threshold of hypercapnia

i'd need sm time to find it but i have it somewhere. and basically i concentrated a small box with CO2 by complete combustion up to 0.04% then applied radiation to mimic the sun at a proportional amount. i also did this with a box that had 0.02% CO2 inside of it (same size of box) and heated that for the same length of time. at the end of this the temperature inside of the box with 0.04% it was significantly high. again i don't have the results with me as it was maybe a year ago but idk where the book is

so that's in support of climate change

You don't need to find anything

I just showed you

The c02 levels are fine

We can handle many more times

Climate change is a hoax perpetrated by greedy and corrupted politicians

Did you even read the article i posted?

Do you understand the difference between .04 and 1 ?

4 out of 100

so the following test had me sat in a box 5m by 5m by 5m and i had set up a point where CO2 would be filtered in by a combustion reaction in an open system separate of the box. i was in there for 30 minutes doing the following: solving equations, solving simultaneous equations and factorisation. i timed how long each question took each one was as difficult as the one before. during this time measurements of CO2 were taken by how much was entering the box per minute and by 0.07% i had noticed about 5 seconds increase in time taken to solve the problems on average. by 0.1% it had increased by at least 10 seconds and my mind was beginning to feel foggy and i lethargic. i continued to .15% at which point i had to leave as i was on the verge of passing out

i fully well understand the difference between 0.04 and 1

The earth isnt 5m by 5m

no but the proportion of concentration means that it doesn't matter

Show me the experiment and accompanying data

i don't think u understand what proportional means

I think you have your numbers wrong

i don't have it with me rn

i don't think i do

Then you are just blowing smoke

Climate change is a hoax

The ice caps are not melting

i think the book might be in my attic and i don't have the key, my room mate does. he won't be home for another couple of hours

They will never melt

The sun doesnt get close enough to the ice to melt it.

ok now ur just not understanding physics

they're waves of radiation not sound waves

Did you read the article i posted or not?

i read enough of it to figure out what kind of garbage i was reading yes

Its nothing to do with physica

i think that the sun's radiation not being strong enough to melt ice caps is *very* much physics

K you are indoctrinated

Was co2 many times higher in the past and did life thrive?

K you are boring to talk to. You have a belief system because you have been indoctrinated by liberal politicians who have paid for fake climate science by agencies like nasa

Gtg bye