Message from @Koro

Discord ID: 557595919269363713


2019-03-19 16:00:33 UTC  

Then you are just blowing smoke

2019-03-19 16:00:45 UTC  

Climate change is a hoax

2019-03-19 16:00:55 UTC  

The ice caps are not melting

2019-03-19 16:00:57 UTC  

i think the book might be in my attic and i don't have the key, my room mate does. he won't be home for another couple of hours

2019-03-19 16:01:02 UTC  

They will never melt

2019-03-19 16:01:28 UTC  

The sun doesnt get close enough to the ice to melt it.

2019-03-19 16:01:42 UTC  

ok now ur just not understanding physics

2019-03-19 16:01:53 UTC  

they're waves of radiation not sound waves

2019-03-19 16:01:57 UTC  

Did you read the article i posted or not?

2019-03-19 16:02:16 UTC  

i read enough of it to figure out what kind of garbage i was reading yes

2019-03-19 16:02:23 UTC  

Its nothing to do with physica

2019-03-19 16:02:46 UTC  

i think that the sun's radiation not being strong enough to melt ice caps is *very* much physics

2019-03-19 16:02:51 UTC  

K you are indoctrinated

2019-03-19 16:03:18 UTC  

Was co2 many times higher in the past and did life thrive?

2019-03-19 16:04:56 UTC  

K you are boring to talk to. You have a belief system because you have been indoctrinated by liberal politicians who have paid for fake climate science by agencies like nasa

2019-03-19 16:05:01 UTC  

Gtg bye

2019-03-19 16:05:20 UTC  

so me doing research independent of anyone else's interests because i was curious as to see if it was actually true about climate change is indoctrination? CO2 has been high in the past while complex life has existed but they didn't need to use cognitive functions like we do now. they used cognitive functions to hunt and seek shelter from rains etc. which i personally wouldn't call complex thought

2019-03-19 16:05:41 UTC  

wouldn’t you say that your belief system is also biased since you don’t seem open to hearing what koro was saying

2019-03-19 16:06:12 UTC  

so again just going back to indoctrination when i did this research to see if what they were saying is true or not and found that if anything that it was under played by the media

2019-03-19 16:06:17 UTC  

Show the data

2019-03-19 16:07:06 UTC  

again i think it's in the attic as it's not in my office space and i don't have a key

2019-03-19 16:07:21 UTC  

Co2 is .04%. We can handle 1% without any detectable limitations

2019-03-19 16:07:28 UTC  

Disprove me.

2019-03-19 16:07:41 UTC  

You are lying. @Koro

2019-03-19 16:07:49 UTC  

I dont believe you.

2019-03-19 16:08:27 UTC  

@mysweettart ive heard what these fear mongers say. We are all going to die in 12 years.

2019-03-19 16:08:35 UTC  

Its a scam

2019-03-19 16:08:45 UTC  

To steal money through taxes

2019-03-19 16:08:58 UTC  

Show the data and experiment

2019-03-19 16:09:08 UTC  

so again i'll refer back to what i said about the cognitive inhibitions that i suffered trying to do what is to me fairly basic maths and the time it was taking me increasing instead of decreasing like you would expect as someone becomes more practised in doing those questions

2019-03-19 16:09:20 UTC  

Your numbers are wrong

2019-03-19 16:09:23 UTC  

so i've explained the experiments i just need to find the records of the data

2019-03-19 16:09:34 UTC  

Look it up

2019-03-19 16:10:01 UTC  

my numbers are wrong? yeah they are going to be slightly out since i don't have the data with me

2019-03-19 16:10:14 UTC  

this was conducted to try and disprove climate change not prove it

2019-03-19 16:10:32 UTC  

if anything my experiments were biased as i didn't fully believe what i was being told

2019-03-19 16:10:53 UTC  

More than slightly

2019-03-19 16:11:00 UTC  

You are completely wrong

2019-03-19 16:11:19 UTC  

Are you a persistent debate troll?

2019-03-19 16:11:44 UTC  

Co2 is .04%. We can handle 1% without any detectable limitations
Disprove me.

2019-03-19 16:11:52 UTC  

ok so when i get that data out and drop it, which is a precise record of what happened, which were designed to disprove climate change is more than slightly wrong?