Message from @Koro

Discord ID: 557594220605734923


2019-03-19 15:53:43 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/551433518991933442/557592548521279508/Screenshot_20190319-085207_Chrome.jpg

2019-03-19 15:53:48 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/551433518991933442/557592570079739925/Screenshot_20190319-085314_Chrome.jpg

2019-03-19 15:54:29 UTC  

We are well be the threshold of hypercapnia

2019-03-19 15:54:31 UTC  

i'd need sm time to find it but i have it somewhere. and basically i concentrated a small box with CO2 by complete combustion up to 0.04% then applied radiation to mimic the sun at a proportional amount. i also did this with a box that had 0.02% CO2 inside of it (same size of box) and heated that for the same length of time. at the end of this the temperature inside of the box with 0.04% it was significantly high. again i don't have the results with me as it was maybe a year ago but idk where the book is

2019-03-19 15:54:41 UTC  

so that's in support of climate change

2019-03-19 15:54:44 UTC  

You don't need to find anything

2019-03-19 15:54:51 UTC  

I just showed you

2019-03-19 15:55:02 UTC  

The c02 levels are fine

2019-03-19 15:55:11 UTC  

We can handle many more times

2019-03-19 15:55:38 UTC  

Climate change is a hoax perpetrated by greedy and corrupted politicians

2019-03-19 15:55:56 UTC  

Did you even read the article i posted?

2019-03-19 15:57:48 UTC  

Do you understand the difference between .04 and 1 ?

2019-03-19 15:58:12 UTC  

4 out of 100

2019-03-19 15:59:17 UTC  

so the following test had me sat in a box 5m by 5m by 5m and i had set up a point where CO2 would be filtered in by a combustion reaction in an open system separate of the box. i was in there for 30 minutes doing the following: solving equations, solving simultaneous equations and factorisation. i timed how long each question took each one was as difficult as the one before. during this time measurements of CO2 were taken by how much was entering the box per minute and by 0.07% i had noticed about 5 seconds increase in time taken to solve the problems on average. by 0.1% it had increased by at least 10 seconds and my mind was beginning to feel foggy and i lethargic. i continued to .15% at which point i had to leave as i was on the verge of passing out

2019-03-19 15:59:43 UTC  

i fully well understand the difference between 0.04 and 1

2019-03-19 15:59:48 UTC  

The earth isnt 5m by 5m

2019-03-19 16:00:04 UTC  

no but the proportion of concentration means that it doesn't matter

2019-03-19 16:00:08 UTC  

Show me the experiment and accompanying data

2019-03-19 16:00:15 UTC  

i don't think u understand what proportional means

2019-03-19 16:00:21 UTC  

I think you have your numbers wrong

2019-03-19 16:00:21 UTC  

i don't have it with me rn

2019-03-19 16:00:27 UTC  

i don't think i do

2019-03-19 16:00:33 UTC  

Then you are just blowing smoke

2019-03-19 16:00:45 UTC  

Climate change is a hoax

2019-03-19 16:00:55 UTC  

The ice caps are not melting

2019-03-19 16:00:57 UTC  

i think the book might be in my attic and i don't have the key, my room mate does. he won't be home for another couple of hours

2019-03-19 16:01:02 UTC  

They will never melt

2019-03-19 16:01:28 UTC  

The sun doesnt get close enough to the ice to melt it.

2019-03-19 16:01:42 UTC  

ok now ur just not understanding physics

2019-03-19 16:01:53 UTC  

they're waves of radiation not sound waves

2019-03-19 16:01:57 UTC  

Did you read the article i posted or not?

2019-03-19 16:02:16 UTC  

i read enough of it to figure out what kind of garbage i was reading yes

2019-03-19 16:02:23 UTC  

Its nothing to do with physica

2019-03-19 16:02:46 UTC  

i think that the sun's radiation not being strong enough to melt ice caps is *very* much physics

2019-03-19 16:02:51 UTC  

K you are indoctrinated

2019-03-19 16:03:18 UTC  

Was co2 many times higher in the past and did life thrive?

2019-03-19 16:04:56 UTC  

K you are boring to talk to. You have a belief system because you have been indoctrinated by liberal politicians who have paid for fake climate science by agencies like nasa

2019-03-19 16:05:01 UTC  

Gtg bye

2019-03-19 16:05:20 UTC  

so me doing research independent of anyone else's interests because i was curious as to see if it was actually true about climate change is indoctrination? CO2 has been high in the past while complex life has existed but they didn't need to use cognitive functions like we do now. they used cognitive functions to hunt and seek shelter from rains etc. which i personally wouldn't call complex thought

2019-03-19 16:05:41 UTC  

wouldn’t you say that your belief system is also biased since you don’t seem open to hearing what koro was saying

2019-03-19 16:06:12 UTC  

so again just going back to indoctrination when i did this research to see if what they were saying is true or not and found that if anything that it was under played by the media