@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 is there a place where i can link?

too easy

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 i can't speak

bot has me muted

and can i get perms to post?

i'd like to post screenshots to go with the references

@MikeHaydenOnCoffeeBreak use a link

hi gentlemen

RLGs debunk

hello fellow MLG flatties

earth round tho innit

Remeber me

Hello fellow flaties

Please

Unmute mee

I will not say thet anymore plesae

But you had a few chances already

Hello peeps

Hello faties

Whoaaa

Thats rude!

@ZeroT is the earth flat

No

How

What?

!rank

Seems like you aren't ranked yet. <:HEHE6:403540176464379925>

hello!

on vaccines, I think research requires far more scrutiny and accuracy than there is right now. I.e. elimination of healthy user bias, longer latency, testing effects of multiple vaccines (all of schedule) with an inert placebo (no aluminum adjuvant) and even going so far as replacing aluminum adjuvant with AHCC adjuvant (has been proven to make at least flu shots more effective (short term))

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/jJgUT7KdSlc/why-government-control-overrated

i think that research, provided that it is put through the peer review process, is under enough scrutiny as it is often put through those against the conclusion as well as those for the conclusion so if it is peer reviewed it is generally undeniably true. i haven't seen a single anti vax study that has been through the peer review process. does the medical production industry/big pharma need more scrutiny when it comes to the manufacturing and basis of prescriptions? yes imo because in the past (iirc the most recent was over half a century ago but none the less) there have been cases where they didn't follow strict enough standards for manufacturing the polio vaccine where they didn't check that the bacteria were actually dead

placebos aren't needed in vaccination trials as they will either work or they won't. the placebo will never work due to the mechanisms of vaccines

yo dudes

slide me that student role

peer review is a process that can be corrupted. Although I cannot show any scientific publication about that, there is however an investigation ongoing:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/

if vaccines work, then it should be confirmed with an inert placebo

otherwise we can say it works because of the placebo effect

furthermore the medical industry has got corruption, so why is there about 4 Billion USD spent on vaccine injury compensation (See VAERS)? And why are the manufacturers made legally immune from liability?

these parts make it questionable

furthermore, aluminum is proven to be toxic and it goes into the body, especially after intramuscular injection in a form of a salt that either dissolves slowly in water or doesn't dissolve in water (Al(OH)3 or AlPO4). That it is present is confirmable by both laboratory testing (destruction with aqua regia before measurement, then using ICP-MS, AAS or AES) and the insert itself (have you ever read the insert made by the manufacturer?)
Being critical towards vaccines doesn't make you anti-vaccine